Search results

Hey Fezzik, are there any rocks ahead? On topic, Artoomis tried to make this the penultimate penultimate discussion. Thanks piratecat for nipping that bit of irony (if that's the correct use of that word) in the bud.

Let me explain. And I'll use small words so that you'll be sure to understand, you warthog-faced bafoon.

That would be absolutely, totally and in all other ways inconceivable.

What bothers me moor is that people just don't seam two know witch word their supposed too use when the words sound the same. edit: Ah ha ha ha! Aye can't believe eye used the wrong 'no'.

Swinging your sword wouldn't be considered normal movement for underwater.

It's that whole Yin Yang thing. You know; soft supresses hard, good couldn't exist without evil, finding calm within chaos. It's a person that uses both aspects of an opposing force.

If I were spending that much per arrow then there would never be any lost. I wouldn't care if I had to swim through 5 feet of sewage. I bet the fighter with the adamantine broadsword would say the same.

Wouldn't a spiked chain designed for a gnome only be 5' reach? A gnome couldn't use a regular spiked chain since it's normally a double weapon, right?

Imagine a 20th level Swordsage with Diamond Mind and Tiger Claw disciplines having taken Raging Mongoose, Girallon Windmill Flesh Rip and Time Stands Still. If this person were to dual-wield (if possible to use weapons from each discipline) how many attacks would he get (assuming 2-weapon...

I thought that you can only use one maeuver per round. The Swordsage gets an ability at a later level that allows them to use two. Can Crusaders do that at 1rst level?

That would take away a ghosts ability to pick up and use Ghost Touch weapons that the PC's were carrying.

What if two Iajutsu Masters squared off? Would they both get a surprise round on the other? Are they required to make some kind of check (sense motive or some such) to see who strikes first? Does it just go straight to initiative?

Have you ever seen the movie Labrynth with David Bowie and Jennifer Connelly?

I doubt any amount of written evidence will sway him. Any time I try that he just claims rule 0. I would consider combining flurry of blows with 'secondary' natural attacks but not a full set of natural attacks (ie. not allowing claw attacks [for creatures with only two limbs] but allowing a...

My current character just entered the Enlightened Fist PrC. I had plans to go the route of the shape shifter for my unarmed strikes plus natural attaks. The DM said that you can't combine the two and I told him that there is an official ruling on it (there is an official ruling on it, right?)...

I often times think of meeting the prerequisite as having the preprequisite. I guess it is flawed logic.

Actually, Some prestige classes have prerequisites of spell casting ability even if the spell casting ability is just a spell like effect. The effect then becomes a prerequisite.

Up to that point yes. But there he is denying the stacking of improved unarmed strike and improved natural attack. (?)

I'm confused by this post. Up to this point he was for improved unarmed attack. Is this serious? Is he being sarcastic? Is he just trying to make a failed attempt at pointing out ambiguity?

No. I don't consider monks to be creatures... I consider the race that has monk levels to be the creature. Human would be a creature, elf would be a creature, gnome would be a ...er something, halfling would be a creature. Monk would be a class, fighter would be a class, wizard would be a...