Search results

This looks like a very interesting product---but I have grown pretty skeptical of digital aides (after a very disappointing run with CMP). So before I download/purchase it---I have a few questions: Has it been reviewed yet by a reliable source? If so---who? (link?) My gaming group has a wealth...

Friday's front page was as just about the best I have seen in the past several months. Snazzy pic of Draconomicon, good info on links, nice all around. If this is going to be the new level----then I am plenty happy with it.

Just seems like 4e is planting the 'You are a good guy, so play a good guy' angle harder than anything in 3/3.5. Many of the PrC and race descriptions in 3/3.5 relished being evil (or at least naughty:devil:)---and almost none of the base races/classes had any 'Dudley Do-right' language.

Neither myself nor my DM have any problems playing evil PC's. I am just commenting on what appears to be WoTC's assumptions regarding the 'Nobility' of PC's.

A lot of the 'roleplaying info' text assumes that you will play your character as a 'noble and good rebel'----opposed to the racial type? For instance---all the examples of playing a Drow (from the FR Player's Handbook) indicate that the PC opposes the Drow races evil tendencies. But what if you...

And now paragraphs of info explaining the links!!! Sweet!!! Getting back to some of the old front page ---upfrontlotofinfo angle!!!

Oooo!!! They put back the dates!!! Psyche!!! Slowly getting back to a snazzy front page!!! (I don't think I am being sarcastic---but am old and jaded so I might be :devil:)

OK, now we are beginning to cook a bit---definitely enjoying the added info with the links on the current front page (9/23/08)

Forked from: Sooo how is everyone liking the new ENWorld? As it stands---I would prefer going back to the old (6 months ago) version of the front page rather than the current form. I was really starting to like the Icon based front page---then---'WhsshhhTT!!!'. Gone. Why?

Starting to really get turned off by the front page... There just simply isn't enough context info. There aren't any date references, no clear indications which website/companies the links are tied to. It may be quicker, but it is not in the least attractive. A website should be FUN, and the...

Of course not!!! But does that mean there are no plans to go back to gee-whiz pretty icons?

The current front page is aesthetically unappealing (ie ugly!)---even if it does provide a lot of link-based info. Also---is it just me or is the front page pretty darn slow?

This rocks!!! Hope PCGen keeps cranking out good 3rd party datasets---Pathfinder for example...

Any clues? I wound up really liking the icon based interface. The current temp front page may be delightfully simple---but it doesn't provide good info on the provided links. I like to know a little bit about where I am going before I follow a link.

I know that there is virtually no chance of it, but I would love to see a new BG game. BG is what got me back into D+D after a 15 year hiatus. It's story-telling, NPC interactions, group formulations, maps, combat, background music...EVERYTHING rocked! Although the 'Sword Coast' expansion from...

One would have hoped that all these designers, developers, and editors would have gotten it right the first time (especially with such an important game mechanic, at the dawn of a new edition), rather than handing us a vague and possibly broken component.

I have been using Firefox for the last 18 months. It is GREAT! I haven't even peeked at Explorer in awhile---so it might be making a comeback---but I prefer to stay away from MS when I can. Firefox 3.0 is very, very nice.

Hmm... I may have spoken too soon. The elimination of the myriad scroll bars is a vast improvement. Now I can easily go through the whole page. Also now there is more helpful text along with the icons. Nice Job!

bottomline (for me) Frontpage: I like the look of the icons, but I miss the wealth of info/links on the front page. I don't really have time to drill down into each of the article/icons. I would prefer being able to read through the info and then select what to follow-up on. Forums: I do think...

Gotta be honest, the new front-page interface is going to take a little while to get used to. It seems more image based (as opposed to text based). Still, it does look awful Purrrty and I am sure I will adjust to it soon. Are there some distinct improvements (in terms of ease of use) that have...