Search results

I kind of agree, at the same time, this is one of the easiest rules to house-rule. :)

I am usually multiclassing or using a hybrid. I could probably make my current Tiefling Wizard, except there aren't any Tieflings yet. In other words, the answer to the question is no. Had the question been: "Can you make a character you would want to play in Basic 5e", the answer would have...

I am a 4e player/dm and I like 5e. I liked 3e as well. And AD&D 2e. And BE[CMI]. Never played 1e. I just started an awesome 4e campaign that I have planned to run up until ~level 10. The only issue I have with it is that it's going to get hard to get time to run 5e. When 4e was released, I was...

Dang it! I don't have time to read it now, it's time for my regular D&D game! :D

@OP I think that 4e was too rigid. With just the PHB it was pretty difficult to create the exact character you wanted*. With about 15 splat books, you can create just about any character. Needing 15 splat books to do that is somewhat of a flaw in my eyes. Looking at what you didn't like with...

Where is it? I am done working for the day. :'(

I love creating unbalanced encounters. It makes the players think outside the box. If they don't their characters is at real risk of dying. Examples: a) Encounter with two types of undead + kobolds. EL 4+ party level. Result: they talked the guardian undead into stopping to attack (they were...

Usually I don't convert, but if I do, 1' = 0,3 meters, so 5' is 1.5 meters. (Multiply by 3, move the comma one space)

Two deaths after four 200xp encounters at level 1, or half a death per encounter? That's too swingy in my opinion. Now, we don't know what this encounter would be "ranked" as by the encounter building guidelines. If this is "deadly" according to those guidelines, they are right on mark. If...

It's pretty easy in 4e as well. Just ban the dragon magazine stuff, and don't let the players select magic items. That cuts down the charop material by 95%. 3e was more or less "broken" from the release of the PHB, but it worked fine up until level 9 or so. I usually only played it from level...

I am reading a full 180 turn in your argument from paragraph one to paragraph two, since you already want to house rule something from the PHB, or maybe even basic rules. In my current campaign we have a Hybrid Paladin/Sorcerer. Really solid defenses (20/15/15/14 at level 1), really strong...

If you look here: http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?356316-Starter-set-being-shipped-early-in-Canada&p=6325285&viewfull=1#post6325285 You will see that the use of some abilities of a magic item requires you to have spell on your class's spell list. Smart deceision in my opinion. :)

As if you can't charop 5e. :D I think that playing gridless, which seems quite possible in 5e is going to be pretty interesting. If you don't have a grid, or a miniature to move around, you will have to describe what you do. That might get people more into the role playing aspect of the game...

It looks good now :)

It shouldn't be particularily hard to add a module that incorporates damage levels into hp that don't go away with "martial healing" or it's kind. You basically add an injury when you go below a certain threshold per fight. For instance at 66, 33 and 0% health you get a minor, medium and...

I even bought a tablet to read pdfs on so it would be more like reading a book. Now, I am glad I did! :D

Numeric fields come up as "18.0" and "4" instead of "18" and "+4". I am using Foxit Reader.

I forgot to breathe! :D

1) It's the characters from Basic 5e 2) There are more complex classes/builds, but those are in the PHB 3) The fighters has traditionally been pretty simple 4) 5e has a simpler combat system than 4e Basic 5e is just that, pretty basic. It's for a quick game you can teach just about anybody in...

Ohhh! Might we get a second wind sub-forum as well as the DoaM sub-forum? :D I was going to say I liked the prime number ones, but I actually like 4e as well, so I like the ones I can list on one hand. :p