Search results

are you implying there aren't christians who would disapprove of the idea of their characters worshipping fictional deities? you're not really selling me on this being a matter of the cultural impact of a dominant religion, much less...friggin'...ethnocentrism. EDIT: also, given that eberron...

how the hell did we get HERE? ...actually, maybe DON'T answer that...

don't forget knacks...

wouldn't he also be the god of Family., then?

it was quoted as if it was one. that's where my confusion was. if it's not, then it's a weird comment to me, but whatever, i guess. ideally, yeah.

ok, but then that sounds like the opposite would be preferable - a class or two that's made to be less customizable with other classes having lots.

i mean, yeah, that i understand, but i meant as a goal, not a technicality.

...why? i started talking to you about this because you expressed confusion about how players could ever notice legendary resistances being used and i pointed out there's tables where it's possible. as for the rest of your post...this seems so far away from where we started that i think i'm...

at being customizable? really?

my question is why do they want to relegate character build choice to a single, highly thematically specific class? seems like a weird goal to me.

wait, no, that sounds awesome, bring that back!

well...yeah. of course i'm assuming that, because i'm talking about tables where they can. i mean, that seems less like rule of cool and more battle strategy. you're not changing the statblock on the fly or making the monster do something it technically can't or anything. but i dunno, maybe i'm...

brother's on that sonic cd grind

the players feel dissatisfaction at being soft-balled. that's the worst that could happen. sure, it's not catastrophic, but for tables where that occurs it can still be a problem. okay...except this was the initial message that kickstarted this side debate (bold for emphasis): so sure, there...

i hate how much this phrase made me laugh.

ah hell yeah, we're so back

...what? okay, no, i don't think you understand what i've been trying to say. let me clarify for...i think the third time now? i am NOT advocating for metagaming. i am not attempting to DISCUSS metagaming. none of what i have been arguing has been meant to be from the perspective of a PC, but...

depends on the table. at yours? probably not. but i'm currently at a table (well, "table" - it's on roll20) where the DM posts enemy abilities and their usage rate as the ability is used. at that table, yeah, i can absolutely track how many uses of a given ability an enemy has. i'm sure there...