Search results

Travis is also very local to WotC (like from the same part of the metro area).

Of Hasbro properties I like Clue for this Of non-Hasbro (because UB has included many more non-Hasbro than it has Hasbro) I want Dragaera, The Hunger and The Dusk, Shadow and Bone, and Legends & Lattes

Planes of the Multiverse, a Magic: The Gathering collection (Lorwyn/Shadowmoor, Bloomburrow, Eldraine, Tarkir, Dominaria + updates to Stryx, Ravnica and Theros)

It's supposed to, but the pregens aren't working as intended today.

Won't they host those on Beyond? Maybe this page? With updates https://www.dndbeyond.com/how-to-play-dnd

That's not a long thyme in most campaigns, but still, the human would have 3 to your 2. It's their provençal

Pledging myself to the version of Bacchus from The Magicians TV show

Dragonborn and Kobolds are what rise from the soul-shards of a dead ancient dragon

And what do the harms of capitalism have to do with moving from a Studio to Franchise model? Why is every discussion about D&D now a demand that capitalism ends?

Will the switch to Franchise model for D&D mean that Exodus is supported by D&D or will it remain its own business unit?

That's normal behavior for a business, not anything near a legal limit. It's not mindlessly literal to use the true meaning of words, particularly when the phrase in question has little to nothing to do with the topic of switching from a Studio to Franchise model -- is that something that is...

There's no evidence that Hasbro has chosen to "make the most profit possible by any legal means." They have taken actions you and I disagree with, but that doesn't mean they've done anything close to this standard you present.

Ah, yes, notably anti-growth competitors Darrington Press, MCDM, EN Publishing, Kobold, Paizo - just happy and content to never grow, ever

I'm not going to ask the details, but it seems covid helped stop a lot of that

It's a starter set, not a new edition.

This doesn't describe the franchise model as their leadership and former leadership have.

They could do that in a franchise model, a studio model, an indie model -- enshittification, like the rants against capitalism existing, isn't related to the change in model

No. The Franchise Model is having the various business units that do D&D stuff actually talk to each other about the stuff they're doing. So the Video Game and TTRPG and TV/Movie and Merchandising teams coordinate on projects rather than what happened post Stranger Things boxed set 1.0

The reason I like the shift to the franchise model is because I want those D&D entertainment things to help get more people interested in the game. I like when more people play D&D. New people add stories I can't add myself. When the Levy project comes out I hope there's a boxed set because I...

In Synnibar the PCs weren't special. Everyone was a mutant-hero-cyborg-wizard. In Twilight: 2000 the PCs aren't special. Everyone is alone, destined to die. I think this question helps define a setting and game more than any other question - even "how common is magic/superpowers?"