Search results

  1. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    So...there is an official, centralized repository that addresses alterations of function, clarifications to intent, and in general answers questions about every other published document related to the 3.5 Edition of the D&D rules (other than mistake corrections, which are appropriately located...
  2. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    Cool, where can I find that?
  3. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    In many courts the Prosection and Defense will provide dismissals by Potential Juror Number to the judge in front of the Jury Pool, but without reasons for dismissal. So you won't know why, but you'll know if it was Prosecution or Defense that dismissed you.
  4. Cedric

    Advice on an encounter

    Hah, thanks. You're the first person to ever comment. The Hindenburg-esque cries of doom were just great. WKRP in Cincinnatti was one of the best sitcoms ever.
  5. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    I guess I fail to see where that is a problem, but I understand that several people do have problems with it. To my thinking, if they want to revise a rule in the FAQ...well, it's their rulebook, their FAQ. Go for it. I don't buy that rules alterations or revisions should be handled only with...
  6. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    9 pages later I'm still replying, so they can get me a padded room next to yours...
  7. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    The whole concept is very simple for me... I have no doubt that by the reading of the MM and PHB, Monk's are allowed to take INA. However, if I had any doubt, the "Official" 3.5 Edition FAQ, presented as Official, by the Publisher of the game, clarifies any existing ambiguity by making it very...
  8. Cedric

    Advice on an encounter

    Dream sequence while sleeping. No fuss, no muss. Just impress upon the player that this is "not" a normal dream. It has a clear, determined quality that lacks the surreal fog of most dreams. While he may have nagging doubts that such things aren't possible...he "knows" this wasn't a normal dream.
  9. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    Comparing it to Weapon Specialization to determine if it's balanced doesn't really work. Based Dmg on a Dagger (Size Medium) is 1d4. If I take Weapon Specialization with that, I'm adding +50% of the weapon's base damage. If I take Weapon Specialization for Greataxe (Size Medium), the base...
  10. Cedric

    Define Core Only for your game

    All of the PHB (Race and Base Class must come from the PHB) PrCs from the DMG (When applicable) Supporting information from the MM (feats, stat info for summoned animals and for druid's shape shifting). As to why I would run core only... When I want the campaign to be more important than the...
  11. Cedric

    Where would you hide your phylactery

    Hmm...good question. I might build a golem around it.
  12. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    Why...why do I let myself get drug back into this!! *cries* *sighs* Ok, from the SRD... Also... The emphasis, via bolding, is mine. INA is a "General" feat, no special rules govern it as a group. If it were meant to be monster only, it would have its own type, "Monster" and have special...
  13. Cedric

    What was WoTC thinking!?!?!?! Power Word Pain

    I don't have access to that book, for the sake of this discussion, could you post pertinent details about the spell?
  14. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    I agree...I'm done, bring on the next debate.
  15. Cedric

    What's the big deal with point buy?

    My point was that 3.x encourages power gaming. It's no more guilty than previous editions of encouraging high stats, other than providing numerous means to attain high stats, permanently even. However the multitude of feats, prestige classes, class abilities and the like encourage power...
  16. Cedric

    Try again <sigh> Monks and Improve Natural Attack

    After a few rewrites, I'll just keep this short. Typically, is an adverb. It applies a qualifier or descriptor to the word or phrase with which it is paired. An adverb indicates manner, time, place, cause, or in our example, degree. In this case, by pairing it with the word "only" it...
  17. Cedric

    Help! - character very poisoned

    Alright, alright...don't let my (Freudian?) slip totally derail the thread. :)
  18. Cedric

    I challenge you, ENWorlders!

    FEAT: Intimidating Motivation [General] Prerequisite: 5 Ranks in Intimidate, 5 ranks in Diplomacy Benefit: Make an Intimidate Check (with a +4 bonus). If you succeed you inspire the target to try harder. Subject immediately gets to reroll a failed skill roll with a +5 bonus/+1 per 2 points...
  19. Cedric

    Help! - character very poisoned

    The secret is to game with people who don't like each other anyway...then you have someone to help hide the bodies.
  20. Cedric

    Help! - character very poisoned

    Surely these PCs aren't the first to assail this area, and likely aren't the first to have had a member fall. Keeping that in mind, you could sow in some bits and pieces of treasure from slain adventures (skeletons still wearing rusted armor, etc). In that cache, you could toss in some potions...
Top