Search results

Thanks! And both of those are good ideas. I'll have to think about them...

I think it is probably because, until recently, D&D was considered small-time compared to M:tG by WotC. They didn't trust the D&D team with their most popular IP. They are notoriously jealous of their style and brand. I think this is a result of 5e's success turning some heads among the brass at...

To everybody saying it is impossible to hybridize the magic systems: I disagree. It is not that hard. My group hashed out a playable framework in a little over an hour. These people are professionals, if there was a demand, they could do it easily.

As a teenager I had a Kor deck from the Tempest set. Man I loved that deck, even though it sucked. So, this makes me happy.

: Double Post :

Do they have a caster who can cast imprisonment? Because this is what it is for.

Or better yet, have him resurrect them out of boredom. GAZE UPON THE WORLD RUINED BY YOUR FAILURE!

Kill them, then have them be resurrected a few centuries later by someone trying to defeat the un-killable tyrant.

By being a problem that exists in 5e.

Agreed. That way if I running one on the fly, I can use its bread and butter spells and no one is the wiser, but if it is my BBEG I can read up in advance and make sure it really milks every resource to pull out a win.

Yeah, that is the thing. I don't like the flipping but at least I know where to look, and I can do it ahead of time. I do think, if you guys will forgive my vulgarity, that a splat book (gasp) style reorganization of the PHB might be cool, even though it'd be burned in effigy for being a...

I know, right? I hate when I acknowledge it. I try to stay above it and then I have to respond and it just ruins the whole thing. Oh well, there's always next time.

Alright, fine. My conversation apparently made you feel bad so you've come and made me feel bad and now we all feel bad. Next you can pretend you don't feel bad so I'm the only one who feels bad and then you win the thread. GG.

My assertion is that the criticism of the thread is much more negative than the criticism of 5e contained in the thread. Please stop treating me like I am an aggressor or an ignoramus.

The most negative part of this thread, by far, is the people coming in here and pooh poohing its existence. If you are tired of this conversation, you don't have to participate. I haven't had it yet. So far, people have been relating and contrasting their experiences and having a good time...

Oh, man. Probably not going to happen. I have no idea where I read it. So, you can dismiss it if you want, since it doesn't make sense anyway, but he was talking about how Perform would be used to make a moving, emotional performance on the instrument and the instrument proficiency would be used...

5. Those started by dread Nyarlathotep, only of his name, ruiner of Gods, in an attempt to undermine the peace of the mind of men.

From what I gather on reposted twitter answers, Mearls rules that if you start combat hidden you can get a sneak attack + advantage, and then if you try to hide again you have to break line of sight (barring special abilities, of course) and you get disadvantage on the hide check since they know...

Oh, you cards, you. :)

See, warcaster is part of the problem, though. Because it exists it indicates that we are expected to keep track of this hand economy stuff, but the game doesn't really help with it very much, and RAW the best way to warcast right now involves dropping your weapon in between turns to cast...