Search results

I have to agree with KarinsDad, insofar as "Stand from prone as a free action" is concerned. Take Quicken Spell for example. It changes casting a spell to a swift action (a free action with the limitation that you can only perform 1 swift action per round) and says it no longer provokes an...

What are you talking about? That's awesome, then the PC who made a spellcheck DC exclaims "We're in deep guano now!"

the +2 offsets the -2 penalty for disguising yourself as another race. Which means that most people, in my opinion shouldn't be able to tell the difference. Personally, I think he's playing a warforged disguised as a fighter in full plate ...

Ah. Well, that too is listed as an exception to the magic-psionics transparency :)

Depending on what level you are starting out at, you could call fast healing 1 +1 LA and use the Unearthed Arcana rules for reducing LA later when it isn't as strong ...

I don't think it's a bad idea, but rather than offing the offenders, why not suggest that they are too strong (or too weak) at character generation?

That's what you get for letting work interfere with posting ;)

I tried a tell-me-about-your-character-and-I'll-make-it-for-you approach but only one person filled out the questionaire :)

Right ... but Shadow Conjuration creates an illusion infused with shadowstuff to make it more real ... the question is would it be reasonable that a Shadow creature be more real (say 10% more) than a Fiendish creature "summoned" through this spell? (In effect, the shadow infusement "goes...

"Luke. Use the Force Shield, Luke ..." A few of the powers have an innate spend +6 power points to cast as a swift action, so I avoided Quicken Power. Thanks for the duration tip; I'll look at the Extend Power and the powers' durations again.

D'oh. Forgot about that. ... but yeah, I house rule it that way.

I think you mean Closed Mind which is listed as an exception to the psionics-magic transparency rules and gives a +2 bonus against powers and psi-like abilities.

Wow. So that's what a critical hit on a threadjack roll is like ... ... (or would it be that the thread failed it's Ignore Me check?)

Well, thinking about it, this version requires you to be 6th level, have combat casting, and 9 ranks in Concentration to qualify for it. At this point, does it make it more likely to cast a spell defensively? A spell caster would have a +13 bonus without a con modifier. At this point, let's...

And with Improved Critical, it threatens on a 12-20. Note the destinction between threaten a critical and confirming one. If your natural roll is one of the numbers in the threaten range and the modified roll would hit, roll again and if the new roll plus modifers would hit the target, then...

In the first case, if you were to allow it, I'd suggest a Sense Motive check to whether ot not the NPC sees him.

I could've sworn there was a rule explicitly forbidding this, but I have no idea where :D

Translated into a table for easy reading: Original damage -> new damage 1d2 -> 1d3 1d3 -> 1d4 1d4 -> 1d6 1d8 -> 2d6 1d10 -> 2d8 2d6 or 1d12 -> 3d6 2d8 -> 3d8

I'm not positive that made sense :) but ... my interpretation is that the symbol spell is triggered when read and the 60 ft is a mundane limitation on how far the symbol can be read. So, my interpretation is that being visible AND legible at 60 ft is a simplified way of saying that it's legible...

I don't remember where it is ... maybe DMG or Monster Manual (Check under improving monsters as HyperSmurf suggested) Basicly, you change the dice of damage. d4 -> d6 d6 -> d8 d8 or d10 -> 2d6 d12 -> 2d8 (off the top of my head ... might be the 3.0 version)