Search results

All three of my copies are just fine.

I'm unclear on how to gain access to these adventures. What's the process?

Thanks! This'll be quite useful. I've already used it to sort out beasts by CR for the party druid.

Looks like some promising lunch-break reading. Thanks for sharing!

Thanks, I skimmed over that bit.

Have we actually seen this definition in an actual product yet? I don't recall stumbling across it, and I'm wondering if we're operating on old information that doesn't line up with the final rules. It almost seems like now CR is simply shorthand for "How high of a proficiency bonus should...

Caveat: I haven't actually read the polymorph spell. Forgive me if this turns out to be misguided. The simplest thing would be to pick a form with a high Con score, I should think.

I'm liking too much to list. It'd be easier just to post a pic of the PHB's table of contents. But I'm disliking two things (so far). 1) Halfling art. 2) The callout that Draconians are a type of Dragonborn. I've always hated that stance. They'll always be unique monsters in my mind.

Nope. One and the same.

I'm looking forward to play with them. I've backed at a high-ish level, and I'm hoping the Kickstarter succeeds because they seem incredibly useful.

Acererak!

It means that they have access to all the adventures (run by the same DM) and some extra loot.

+7 proficiency bonus... so... CR 21-24. Not bad.

I thought Thaumaturge was the one who did puns? You're definitely stealing his schtick.

Except that one sets the other. IE -- all monsters of a certain CR are worth the same XP. So the two are kind-of the same thing ultimately.

Sting is a verb. Also a noun. And that really cheezes me off! :lol:

We'll have to disagree on that one. I tend not to make sweeping changes without first seeing the long-term effects of what I'm trying to change. Otherwise I find I've made a short-sighted decision that I often have to go back and reverse because of a knee-jerk reaction.

I can't help but think it's a little bit early to be nerfing a class' signature ability.

But... but... the result of a Blade Pact is a Pact Blade, isn't it? Oh sorry, I wasn't supposed to argue. Umm... what cheeses me is ... actually, I'll need some time to think about it. Coming up empty at the moment.

You keep typing this phrase. I don't agree with its use for two reasons: 1) I don't feel it's accurate; and 2) It's a little inflammatory, honestly. I can see where it may have (and obviously did) cause you some confusion, but I think the bulk of readers probably understood what was meant...