Search results

No, but I have had feedback from friends that have played with them. I have not had a full report from them on everything yet but talked to the player that played one of the 2 bards in the party. The player normally likes bards and support characters but said it was terrible and would never play...

Group 1 - Netherdeep - Just finishing up. Lvl 12 Kobold Drakewarden Ranger - My PC Half-Orc Hexblade Warlock Eleven Hollow-one Phantom Rogue Human Hollow-one Trickster Cleric Drow Chronurgy Wizard left party, replace by: Human Redemption Paladin Group 2 - Rime - Lvl 9 Half-Elf Bladesinger...

Oath of the Ancients 20 + 1 = 21 Oath of Conquest 5 Oath of the Crown 3 Oath of Devotion 25 - 2 = 23 The paladin for those that want more paladin on their paladin but don't want any flavour other than paladin Oath of Redemption 17 Oath of Vengeance 19 Oath of the Watchers 18

Oath of the Ancients 22 +1=23 Oath of Conquest 14 Oath of the Crown 10 Oath of Devotion 25 Oath of Glory 2 Oath of Heroism 7 - 2=5 This is just a draft version for what become Glory Oath of Redemption 21 Oath of Vengeance 20 Oath of the Watchers 20

To answer my own questions currently I am thinking that I would stick with 5e rather than change to the proposed changes but would take a few things and use them in my games. One of the DMs I play with says that so far they think they will stick with 5e,they don't understand what WotC is thinking?

I'm not saying it will but that it could. Part of me thinks that the changes we are seeing will be scaled back due to negative feedback and not be as many big proposed changes that we have seen so far in the playtest material. But if the level of changes (or something close) that we are seeing...

I hate the standardisation of spell lists. I really like Warlocks and part of that is their unique spells. Hex and Armor of Agathys and such. Yes there are some subclasses that get some of them, and ways to get some of them with feats, but they remain rare outside of Warlocks. Now Bards can hex...

I have some questions for people, especially the fans of the old/current rules... How often have you seen PCs with more than 1 or 2 level of Exhaustion? What is the most Exhaustion you have seen on PCs? And how did the party react to when a party member(s) ended up with a higher amount of...

I prefer the new rules over the old/current rules. I think no matter what the final rules end up I will use a houserule adding a few of the Old to the new. At Exhausted 5 or 6 I will add Half Speed; at 7 or 8 I'd add Half Max HP; and at 9 add Speed becames 0. But ever without my changes I think...

Oathbreaker 14 Oath of the Ancients 21 + 1 = 22 Their channel divinities are not the best but their Aura is top notch Oath of Conquest 20 Oath of the Crown 20 Oath of Devotion 21 Oath of Glory 20 Oath of Heroism 20 Oath of Redemption 21 Oath of Treachery 14 - 2 = 12 No one want a treacherous...

Monsters reducing ability Scores: eg Intellect Devourer reduce Int, Shadows Reduce Str

Multiclass requirement.

Drunken Master 8 Kensei 8 Open Hand 9 - 2 = 7 Shadow 4 + 1 = 5 Sun Soul 2

I don't want this approach. If the first concern with class design is Class Group before it's own identity it will lead to bad class design. In the UA a Paladin is assigned the priests group and that group is defined as "Stewards of Divine or Primal magic, focusing on healing, utility, and...

I agree that are not worth a feat. It is an odd choice to make them feats when they are still using them as class features. The Ranger still gets one at 2nd level. I guess it cuts down on word count when you only print them once in the Feat section and just list which ones each class can take...

I don't think this is likely at all. The reason being is that the Expert Group is define as "Polymaths who have the Expertise feature and elements of other Classes" JC talked about how the Experts, being Polymaths, take abilities from other groups/classes. If one of the defining characteristics...

I suspect they will be standardising Subclasses across Class Groups rather than across the board. The Expert Group all have their subclasses start at 3rd like they do now. If they standardise per Group I suspect Warrior Subclasses will start at 3rd and progress like Expert, but the other groups...

Ascendant Dragon 21 Astral Self 15 + 1 = 16 Drunken Master 18 Four Elements 4 Kensai 22 Long Death 21 Mercy 9 Open Hand 23 Shadow 22 Sun Soul 22 Tranquility 8 - 2 = 6 hoping this long dead UA failed experiment dies before the 4 Elements

No, it is not objectively the best. (My subjective opinion is that) Echo and Rune Knight are mechanical better and several others are more fun to play. I consider the Battlemaster to be one of the more boring subclasses. You can have whatever subjective opinion you like, but don't mistake it for...

Ascendant Dragon 18 Astral Self 22 + 1 = 23 While Shadow will win this one, I want this to at least give it a little competition Drunken Master 19 Four Elements 18 Kensai 20 Long Death 20 Mercy 16 Open Hand 19 Shadow 22 Sun Soul 20 Tranquility 20 - 2 =18 I was going to downvote 4 Elements...