Search results

You know, DJ, you would have made my life much easier if you had included an All of the Above option...

I got the reservation, but Rel was too cheap to pay.

I know I'd get a lot of joy out of banning you, Rel...

Trust me, it hurt me more than it hurt you...

Yeah, but your misquoted quote isn't the one being taken to task, so it's all good. Edit: There, took out the reference to you, since it wasn't important to my point. :)

No, we really aren't. WotC is a business whose product is a game. It puts out the version of the product that they think will work best. We aren't stakeholders, nor do we have any say. If we don't like their product, we don't buy it. But WotC has no duty to cater to us. Which would, in fact, be...

There are a BUNCH of people here who have some serious attachment issues.

Personally, if WotC published all their books in a downloadable html format, all links and such (like Sovelior/Sage's SRD, but all the Complete Books and whatnot), I'd never buy another print gaming book again...

Totally agree! The beginning of the end. If it's not electronic, it will be the Miniatures game. D&D as we know it is on it's way out. Given the number of people who have hundreds, if not thousands, of posts here and elsewhere, I'm going to disagree. Can't be that bad, or all us fatbeards...

But what if the one doing the carrying does a 4x movement run (assuming carrying her doesn't put him encumbered). Could she still do anything that turn?

Here's the scenario: Half-orc picks up a light female character. Next round, the Half-Orc, carrying the woman, runs at 4x movement. Could the female cast a spell at the end of that run? If not, why? (Our group, out of boredom, is having a nice argument about this.) The argument for allowing it...

Once Apple releases the next gen video iPod, things will change. Especially if they're smart and build in WiFi streaming to computers/internet. But a widescreen iPod is just a matter of when. I think the absolute latest would be MacWorld in Jan '08, but I'd be surprised if they wait that long...

Geez, only one of those is still open, and it's talking more about WotC editing incompetence than the INA feat. Bummer.

I'd love to, but I think you guys have shut down those older threads...

You are correct. Wizard posted in the Rules of the Game that monks can, indeed, take INA. Of course, there will always be those who say that since it's not in the official errata, it's not a legitimate rule. Stubbornness abounds...

Yeah, I'm not sure what San Diego was thinking. I've never been impressed with him as a head coach.

Yeah, the QB is pretty much the default if there are no other standouts. And, let's face it, Manning played a hell of a game. He really took control after that early TD. Of course, the Colts D did a hell of a job, too.

Since the award wouldn't go to two players (Addai and Rhodes should share it), then Manning will probably get it. Guess we'll see.

Going in to the 4th quarter, I can't believe Chicago is still in it. Indy should be blowing them out right now. Could be an exciting finish.

You sure the data can't be recovered from the hd? I've got a MacBook Pro 17" (work computer). Amazing machine. No real advice, other than to enjoy! And yeah, at least 1GB RAM. I've got 2 on this machine, and it screams.