Search results

Maybe a Spot check to see the PCs in the grove, with failure indicating no targets can be seen. Depending on the trees in the way, I'd either use cover or concealment. Either way, a Hide check could be in play. 120 feet away is a -12 on the Spot check and I'd probably give around a -4 penalty...

Me thinks you protest too much. Chill out.

2E Ravenloft had the Undead Treant all statted out. Dunno if it made its way into 3E conversion. Maybe someone familiar with 3E Ravenloft knows?

To be honest, I don't really care about what the argument's become. Now it's pretty much two people slogging it out in a grudgefest. Someone in that thread suggested a poll. Here it is. I think the average DM has more than enough information to make a decision at this point.

See the thread linked below: http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=222079 Would you allow the Augment Healing feat to apply to Mass Lesser Vigor (or any of the Vigor spells, really)?

Ahh, good catch.

From Spell Compendium, p. 177: Target: Allies within a 30-ft. radius burst centred on you When you cast this spell, you fire your allies and companions with ... Allies gain ... Does this spell affect the caster? My initial reaction is no (since the caster is not the "allies") but if the...

But at the levels you're talking about, making the check won't be a problem. Strength alone will negate most of the penalty and you don't have to worry about a shield penalty so in effect the heavy armour is only negating a couple ranks of Jump. Plus, he's a fighter so his skill point selection...

I think part of the problem is the numbering of editions. This was probably unforeseen at the time, but having 1E, 2E, 3E, 4E means you have 4 different editions to play. They should have stuck with just one edition: the D&D edition.

Meh, I dunno how overpriced they are. On average I spend around 50 cents a mini on Ebay. But I do buy a lot in bulk (or at least I used to). If you're not buying lots of cheapies to offset the more expensive singles, then yeah they may be expensive.

I think WotC did a real disservice to the game when it moved away from publishing adventures. If they weren't selling then maybe they should have offered them for free over the net. You need a way to enable DMs and players to get a game up and running in minutes rather than hours. Maybe even...

There was a monster from 2E Ravenloft that would be a perfect fit for this concept. I believe it was a wicker golem or something like that. It was on the cover of a Ravenloft module, IIRC. The story went something along lines of the golem was collecting all the missing scrolls that were used to...

I've noticed that there isn't much buzz about the DDM lines anymore. The newest set is coming out and, I have to say, there's no minis that really jump out and grab me and the set as a whole is a big, "meh." (don't get me started on yet another gargoyle mini) The last set seemed to come and go...

I remember the Grimtooth's Traps books which had excellent, interesting, and innovative (not to mention lethal!) trap designs. Too bad a couple die rolls and all that work goes down the toilet.

Petitions??? Yawn. *hits ignore*

Yeah, unfortunately. I was reading about Gygax's passing and how he lamented the shift away from storytelling to tactical battle mapping and I'm growing increasingly concerned about the direction 4E is going. Don't get me wrong, I could put up with the 3E level of tabletop play but 4E seems to...

They need to make traps... A) More interesting; B) Scale better with level advancement; and C) More than just a Search/Disable Device/Reflex check.

You're really not going to like 4E then. ;)

What's the original corrupt creature from?

I agree with the second poster. Just let Quick Draw do it. It's not worth spending a feat just to be able to quick draw items.