Search results

I'm curious about the solo adventure. What's it like?

We have done it occassionally, when a shortage of players required it in order to get a representation of all the core classes at the table, but it was usually only one person playing two characters. We've never done all of the players playing two or more characters. The times I've played two...

Do we know the street date yet on these?

Man, this is embarrassing. We still haven't finished the Adventure Path modules. We're talking the original Adventure Path series of modules. :o

Man, I didn't even remember posting this originally. :) The only answer I would change would be No. 1, to 6 players. Maybe it is from playing in and running so many RPGA Living Greyhawk and Eberron Mark of Heroes mods during the past year, but I just see 6 players as being sort of the magic...

About 60 percent. I use a lot of published material, but I change everything at least a little bit to fit the campaign.

Usually I try to multiclass the primary base classes into my vision of the character I want to play, because usually there isn't a base class that completely encompasses that vision.

Usually. Although there is something to be said for having only one or two players. Depends on the campaign and the players.

Difficult to answer. At various times Traveller and Cyberpunk 2020 have been my favorite RPG, while at other times D&D has been.

I've played D&D more consistantly over the years than any other RPG.

I think the PCs should be better by default than the average NPC. But there can still be NPCs in the game better than the PCs. They just aren't tending bar or running a tailor shop.

Prefer, no. But most of the settings I play in tend to be humanocentric.

Hard for me to say. I've always played as an adult, at least legally -- I started when I was in college when the drinking age was still 18, which I was for most of my senior year of high school. In my home group, I've always just played with other adults. Now, as I'm starting to run some RPGA...

Currently I also play T20 on a regular basis. In the past, I've played other RPGs. I like having a sci-fi game to balance against the fantasy elements of D&D or other sword & sorcery-style games.

We range in age from 40 to 52.

In the Forgotten Realms, either Sharess or Lliira. In Greyhawk, Olidammara.

I say if it ain't Brokeback, don't fix it. :D Seriously, you know your players better than any of us do. Our campaigns and gaming groups are all different. There are similarities, true, but the differences are the most important factors. What happens in our games may not work in your game...

If the end results would give you some tangible, in-game effects, such as bonus feats and skill ranks, along with some penalties to balance things out, I would be all for it. But otherwise, I would prefer to come up with my own character background rather than roll on a bunch of tables to...

Back in 2E, when you had to calculate the volume of the fireball and how much space it filled up, we had a player who was playing a wizard, and he had just leveled up so he now could learn the fireball spell. He was very eager to use it. The next dungeon the group entered, they found a smallish...

Maybe it's just me, but the ogre skirmisher looks like Jar-Jar Binks in the face and head. I can't wait to get a whole gang of tavern brawlers and sic 'em on my players next time they're in town.