Search results

So out of everything in the new PHB these are the following archetypes that I am a little disappointed in. 1:Zealot - I don't feel like this has that much of a mechanical identity that is different than the Berserk barbarian. It was a great archetype when the berserker was broken but now that...

Except that their setting is an eldritch horror setting so it makes sense that that is what they would be writing about.

I am currently playing a half orc Artificer (Artillerist) who is a labor union boss in Ebberon. The character is a blast to play. His spells are different types of ammunition or devices he whips up. Conjure Bonfire is a land mine, Cure Light Wounds is my whiskey and things like that...

So nothing confirmed as of yet, there is barely any chatter on their different discords but it is sounding higher power than Warhammer Fantasy. I am thinking they are going to use the soulbound rules since those are better for representing wargame heros

From what little I have heard it will be more heroic than 4e where you are usually just a normal person, an apothecary, guard, rat catcher. Instead this will be closer to AoS where you are playing a character type from the war game like White Lion but not as over powered as AoS where you kill...

Yeah when I first read the name when the book came out I was expecting more of the cavalier. I know back in 3rd ed I had a character that was a purple dragon knight but God that was so long ago I can't remember what the prestige class was like so I don't even remember if the whole inspiring...

I am sorry I was thinking of the martial classes not the full casters since there are and have always been in a league of their own.

This has been my statement to them with every play test feedback about the druid. The only thing we can look at is the new monsters released in the giant book. We have a cr 5 huge beast that has a respectable 24 strength so their attack bonuses is +10. Otherwise it is fairly similar to the cr...

I am sorry but this statement is laughable. Paladins are still one of the most powerful classes out there. Just because they have other uses for their bonus action doesn't make them a bad class.

The pdk is a subclass that the game definitely needs but it would take a lot of reworking. I think that that is why the class is ranked so poorly, not because people don't want it but because we realized that they couldn't make it in time for the phb release.

The biggest problem is that is is considered crit roll content and because of that they will never put it into a core book.

I would also be completely fine if they got spells at a normal rate of every other level but never got more than 5th level spells. However I do not mind pact magic but I do understand that those who do usually vehemently despise it.

To be honest the only way that the moon druid suffers is with a low attack bonus. Since we have still not seen any beast options stated out, monsters proficiency bonus might scale better now that it used to. (Which was horrible). With the extra radiant damage and then the extra elemental damage...

I think that some of Tasha's sub classes will get all updates to bring them in line. The Beast barbarian needs it's level 3 power tinkered with with the addition of weapon mastery. I also believe that the Artificer needs to be overhauled maybe to be more like the Warlock with just a few spell...

So the mechanic I that you get ad antage so it is impossible le for you to do anything that you could not already do with a good roll. Drugging someone is taking away their free will while this is giving you a better odd that is a huge difference. This is not mind control, this is not ruffieing...

While I agree that enchantment is creepy the freinds cantrip is hardly drugging someone. All that is does is give you advantage, you could get the same thing by good roleplaying, fancy cloths, guidance to help you say the right words.

Or a slight of hands check, that can also be used to hide what you are doing with your component pouch.

Just holding a staff in your hand counts as having your component so anyone walking with a staff could be casing a spell on you. A person who powders their nose might be casting charm so it is not necessarily obvious. Also most commoners don't know what a charm spell would look like if it is...

So back when Chris was talking about the necromancer he mentioned the biggest changes they wanted was getting your undead at lvl 3 when you took the subclass and the ability to have a horde at later levels both of witch I feel would fix the subclass. As far as necromancers in other classes...

So I have a few problems with the the Brawler 1: If I am going for a strength based unarmed character, which I do love, I want unarmored as well which this dose not provide. 2: It's ability seem to be trying to represent several concepts, the unarmed, the improvised but they work against each...