Search results

What about replacing enlarge person with enlarge fey, adding the following note: "(This works exactly as enlarge person, but affects only feys instead of humanoids)" ? Glad to be of assistance.

If you do, remember to also eliminate the reference to the spell in the flavor text. Yes.

I'm not sure how snatch works, so I'll pass this one. 35#: With the skills they have, they have a good chance of surprising the PCs. Sp abilities are silent, so they will be able to prepare without alerting the victims. They buff themselves with stoneskin,keen edge, flame arrow, and finally...

#37 I am not sure this merits CR 1. The part about the DOGS inflicting only non-lethal damage is the primary reason (BTW, if they are supposed to inflict non-lethal damage without taking the normal -4 penalty then the damage should be (1d4+1 non-lethal) or it should be noted that they don't take...

#19 If the caster level for the Sp abilities is low, then CR 1 is OK. #24 seems OK #25 CR 13 #27 CR 5 #28 Even with the powerful "Icicles" ability I think this is better at 15 than at 19 #29 OK #30 OK #31 OK #32 OK #33 1 is OK, it has a high DR, but it is slow... and has a feat it cannot use...

Too bad that is the case. Their flavor is not very epic neither (a CR 21 that can be defeated by a kid?) I guess the creature could get something like 40 HD, but with epic feats (if that is OK).

Combat reflexes?? :D Well, to be fair a large creature with low dexterity can benefit from combat reflexes, since they have a low initiative and Combat Reflexes lets then take an AoO even if flat-footed. Is funny nonetheless :). Maybe 50. :heh: The problem is that this creature is weak to...

I said Explode because that increases the relation damage/hp lost. Using explode is harmful for the creature, ability focus makes the sacrifice more worthwile. 26. Weapon focus (rock), Weapon focus (greatclub), Iron Will, Improved critical (Greatclub) (This certainly is not CR 21) 27. Expert...

Indeed. But Magic, Epic, (Aligment), and most (Material) are Su, while /-, adamantine, and weapon type (Slashing, piercing, bludgeoning) are Ex

So, I have to select feats appropiate for the creatures? This looks fun :) 19. I'd say Alertness, but Skill focus(hide) crossed my mind. (+8 init? That sould be +3 unless there is some racial modifier that I am missing, also the AC is 14 (+1 size, +3 dex)) 20. Stealthy 21. Blind-fight (for...

I think in 3.0 you either had to make a full attack with natural attacks or manufactured weapons, so maybe this was a new concept. So I vote for 1, but in a nice way :D Well, I would say the ambidexterity lets this DUDE keep a full strength bonus (and no attack penalty) when attacking with a...

2 arms?! I guess that with only two arms (and the change to natural ambidexterity) the full attack line would be: "Full Attack: 2 Kama +5 melee (1d6+3), and bite +3 melee (1d6+1)"

(This is the first time I see a creature of the "humanoid" type with claws, or four arms, or a bonus of +8 natural. Is it not "Monstrous humanoid" more fitting?) Well, the pounce ability makes the change I propose to ambidexterity more powerful, but even with that this creature doesn't seem...

It looks almost done. ("almost" because i'd put a "but" in the start of ", if the BIRD attacks") I'd say this is done. Certainly it contradicts the original ambidexterity, the thing is that I changed the ability because it didn't appear so "absolute" to me (maybe I do this too often?)...

I voted 8th and beyond, even if I haven't DMed past 14th level yet. I like spending time thinking ways to make the most out of NPCs. I also enjoy the freedom high level gives me when making adventure plots and locations.

When I imagine how this ability looks, it seems that a creature whose weapon gets stuck leaves his guard down, but there is no mention on AoOs. That is why I thought that the creature may lose the grip on the weapon. Good. Dexterity seems the most appropiate choice as you said. This may...

There are some things that may be worth adding, like saying that the rider cannot make use of Evasion since is so confined, but generally it seems to be OK. Great Glad you liked the idea. :) The farastu's "Adhesive slime" is con-based. And even if the construct has a Con score of - I'd go...

Good indeed. Well, I think there is not such thing as one-half cover in 3.5. The closest thing is soft cover, which is provided only by creatures, and gives +4 to AC but no reflex bonus. I think soft cover should replace one-half cover in the text. Also, the rule for hitting the cover instead...

You are totally right. Oops. :p I would say caster level 11 (for animate objects), but I don't know of a hard rule about this. (For example the clay golem requires the caster to be 11th level, but also requires resurrection, a level 7 spell) (!) I didn't notice that. Yes, Craft Construct is...

Well, I was thinking in making it a free action to activate and maintaining, since it seems weak to make it a standard action, considering it must move to keep it up, and also it last only 5 rounds. Wait, unless I am the one confused, it seems you have made a common mistake. If the creature...