Search results

I was really hoping for race tracks too. It would have made monster races easier to do and balance for pcs and it really would have lived up to the claim that the race matters at all levels of play.

crazy idea. Maybe you could buy from amazon instead of your distributor when deals like this come along? get a few copies from the distributor opening day, but have the rest in pre orders so they will arrive a day or two after that. hay the shippings free. it may not make sense but you will be...

alittle off topic I was thinking about it, and Elven Ranger with a bow seems to be class with the least amount of mad, along with possibly a rogue using dex. Dex is used for attack, damage, Ac, and wis is used for secondary extras. its really a class (so far) that you could just dump full...

lets hope all these errors in this book are not taken from the phb, or else we are going to have LOTS of editing mistakes for 4e.

woot, love the orc ball reference. Yay cant wait till next game. *edit* Also about the direct linking, cant that be turned off on his server? I mean yeah...

When I read your first post that talked about experience, I had a hunch it was about boffer combat. twf is easer done with lighter weapons (although i still manage to suck at it somehow). I dont have the knowledge or experience to debate if twf was historically true or not, but i do know some...

I agree. I shouldn't have to buy more books then the main 3 to play the "core game" and i shouldn't need to buy phb2 to get classes I had in phb1 in 3.5. Its just annoying. For that wizards had received my undying annoyance.

looks pretty cool, its right leg (picture plane left) is off somehow.

They should have replaced warlock with druid and made the druid a controller with plant, stone, and wind shaping spells. d&d i feel always benefited from archetypes and symmetry. I think having 3 strikers was a mistake.

I hate with 4e that they basically took the game and divided it in half to sell the rest off later.

It depends on how much they get paid really.

I like everything about it except The colors are a tad too chromatic in my view, and it doesn't seem to have a designated plane to walk on (even an invisible one)

agreed. Yay mythology!

as a player i think encumbrance is fun. Its not for everyone though.

link?

Find a tree and mark it or visualize a target. Stab with the sword at the tree. now stab with the dagger. You will notice that you hit your mark more often with the dagger. The weight of the sword makes it slightly more encumbering then the dagger. it requires extra effort to maintain...

rules or info on crafting said weapons. Also I wonder if they kept the mechanic were each weapon has a ?maneuver? or whatever built into it. early after 4e their was talk that weapons would have uneq abilities or something to that effect. I wonder if they are still apart of the game. Thier was...

I dont get it, it says this under general rules Under client rules it says this. am I missing something? How can you have a iconic landscape and a solid color background?

I think it works. It was shooting for natural pigments, and i think it did it well. It would not have been well executed if parts of the image poped in this case. I think the simultaneous hue works for the creature type makes it part of the earth. think of it as well executed camouflage ;p

its as cool as any other custom lens flair ;p. I agree though, its too stiff. Also on a layout note, Why would you ever put an image in the center of the binding like that?