Search results

This is true, but also untrue. If it were fully true, everyone would be successful artists, and their would be no knowledge to learn from the masters.

ug thats a shame. they were the best controllers in 3.5 at mid level.

Logan better tell his co-workers they got the image labeled wrong.

The mundane is dead. Long live the mundane. "and then when I sell my technology, EVERYONE will be special... and that way, no one will be."

I don't care about the article much, but the art is some of the best i have seen for 4e.

I don't think the 4e barbarian will be illiterate. However I also don't think the druid will the a striker. I think it will be a controller, given its 3.5 spell list.

I worry about the monster art just a bit. When you show somebody your art, you show them your very best. Is this the very best wizards has? some of its really good, but i am a bit afraid to see the bottom of the bucket. Will it be like 3.5?

So thats what proficiency does?! I knew that their were proficiency in 4e and I knew certain weapons got a bonus to hit, but I didn't know they were one and the same.

if we were given permission to read the license, their would have *not* been an uproar... I find that interesting. *lost in a edit i guess

what does prime shot do?

so what about the girl gamers who don't want man boobs? ;) I also understand what your saying in the other parts of your post I didn't quot, I just don't know if I agree.

Is it improbable to assume that something can lay eggs yet nurse their young but its natural for said creature to assume the basic humanoid shape without any divine assistance? Once divine assistance is needed, doesn't one throw logic out the window? i think thats little odd myself. I'm just...

Any time the figure is put to paper its an expression of the body. Any time one thinks of the body its an expression of sorts. We are anthropomorphizing lizards into humans. We give them them male breasts why should they we not have female breasts as well? Are you going to make me drudge up...

I tend to think the roles are reversed. I think it those that have a knee jerk reaction to dragonborn and boobs cheapens the elegance of the figure and reeks of "conservative family values". It reminds me of the kind of people who wanted to shut down d&d in the 70s and 80s. I'm not saying that...

Dragonborn are something with boobs... thats all i got.

Can anyone explain to me how its not a poison pill, it seems to skirt the issue of how its not a poison pill. It seems to me to be a more localized poison pill rather then poisoning the well its poisoning the drink. Perhaps I am misunderstanding?

wow elves get cruddy feats :( No bonus to damage with bows? I still am hopeing that their is a bonus of some sort with proficiency overlapping from race and class.

If the paragon and epic classes tells us anything, their is probably a class feature at level 6.

if a character has 10 hit points and takes 12 damage, i see that as a solid hit that to the chest or head. if the character has 90 it points and takes 12 damage, I see that as a hit to a non vital body part. The con is represented in the ability to time after time avoid deadly blows and continue...

I was under the impression that hit points were always abstract. think about it like this. If hit points were literally the damage a character can take and receive, does that mean having more hit points allows a character to receive more stabs to the heart or that they are harder to decapitate...