Search results

4e has way better VTT integration on Fantasy Grounds.

Yeah, it’s not that serious. I noticed the website pics are decent enough to read when zoomed in as is. Just thought I should mention that the mobile version has issues (I thought they were too low res at first).

No further options to open the image in a new tab unfortunately, on the mobile browsers.

Maybe the game language oriented and uniform presentation of powers, plus the uniform recovery and acquisition rate of powers.

On Safari and Chrome on iOS I can’t zoom in on the pictures on the levelup site, after clicking on them.

The pictures are too low resolution, can’t read the text!

All but one published haunt allows Religion, so that’s a go-to even if you don’t or can’t know how to disable a haunt. Spirits are also not the same thing as undead in PF2; spirits can be undead, so a spirit undead could be affected by Turn Undead (which is a feat for the heal spell). But other...

I think it’d be Religion or Occultism? Even if only one PC is good at those, how’s that any different from figuring out a golem or some other specialty monster? Or disabling a mechanical trap?

Neat! Although I kind of wish its claws and horns attacks had something extra to go along with the damage. Nothing big, just a bit of added complexity (which would be fine on a tarrasque!). The same for the breath weapon. Maybe it could blind you on a failed save, or if you failed by 5 or more.

So one piece of info is enough, isn't it? How to calm down the spiritual haunt?

I don’t think the PF2 rules are particularly well presented but I don’t quite understand why haunts are so gamey when the GM can dole out information with Recall Knowledge checks like with any other situation where the characters don’t know what they’re dealing with.

I think the required knowledge would be part of the class kit. If you know how to perform druidic magic, you would know the components for the various spells. I just let the characters purchase expensive components in suitable settlements.

Ignoring a defender's mark isn't the DM playing suboptimally. A fighter can miss the immediate attack, or the enemy can have trouble hitting the fighter. I often have enemies trigger a defender's punish mechanic because a particular situation warrants it, and the result can be a squishier PC...

Yeah, there are plot and adventure hooks throughout the geography section.

Are there plans to bring the Level Up products to the Roll20 marketplace?

There is a save, but it’s made against the initial performance. I think it could be a 1 minute performance and charmed without a save, followed by a 9th-level mass suggestion, no save because you need a minute anyway, and this is intended to be a capstone. Whether it’s 12 or 50 people rarely...

Really? If the capstone is intended to be something different, not just numbers, and something that you’re not going to keep for very long since the campaign is likely to wrap up, why not go way beyond what the rules offer? What if a druid could change the climate of a region once per week...

If these capstones are intended to feel a little overpowered, you’re gonna need to amp up the overpoweredness a whole lot more! The bard capstone is basically a subtle mass suggestion, but with a long casting time… that’s overpowered at level 20? Once per day turn a miss into a hit? Gain...

I pretty much always include dragons in my campaigns. In 4e you can easily add dragon antagonists even at lower levels. I’ve used so many different dragon types over the years, in various roles. They’re awesome. I’ve even had campaigns where every single level of adventuring has included a...

There’s a red dragon in the foreground of the cover, but is the other dragon with the spine a new design? Maybe a gem dragon?