Search results

I like the logic behind this question: Player: Hey, I have this power that I really like, do I have to get a new one? DM: No, you don't have to Player: But it's less powerful, so... DM: Right. Player: That's not fair! DM:umm... wat?

So in the 4e forum, where it is declared you can either go with the product or not. you say "No, see I can buy other products." Unnecessary, and terribly placed flaming (however well worded it may be), based on a product's utilization and dependence on new technology to make more money, is just...

I would read it as you don't have to be bloodied. Basically because you can't clarify it any better without some really weird wording.

So we've come from "anyone who doesn't try to stealth while invisible is an idiot" to "The DM didn't do it"? Its not a fault of either of them, its a stupid rule. I would think that it's much more often problematic then you are attempting to envision. Not to say it's a problem even 1/3 the...

Or it just used all of its actions... it happens...

But yeah, I'm with KD kinda, remembering the state of your character is an important part of roleplaying. And leads to players getting into their characters more. Rather then just "I kill an orc" playstyle.

I think of it in... idk how to describe it... presets? I'm totally ok with the group saying "i prepare for a fight" and "I prepare for a jump" and allowing that to immediately mean armor is either summoned or not summoned, weapons, shields what not.

Just to clarify. The opponent automatically KNOWS where the invisible creature is unless it stealths.

I love that idea, players who choose the "bad sign" background always just have rotten luck. Players that choose "auspicious birth" always have people begging them for help. All backgrounds can have negative and positive influences on options and RP possibilities, but since they are the best...

Yeah.... in 4e invisibility means you aren't invisible. But it has a whole lot of other cool stuff.

Looks like I have yet another house-rule...

Whenever there are competing speed things like this, i handle just like that. Or this comes up in EVERY SINGLE SESSION of my game: Insane halfling paladin: I want to decapitate this guy. Reasonable fighter: ugh.... I want to attempt to stop him from decapitating this guy. Me: coo, roll those...

Yoink!

Dreadnought? :p I don't think any of the Pally PPs are all that great compared to fighter or other mc options.

Goliath Great weapon figher, great-axe, Goliath weapon prowess, weapon master's strike, 20 in str 16 in con 1d12 + 5(str) + 3(con) + 2(weapon prowess) = avg damage 16 from a figher.

How would you handle the idea that controllers and leaders can become much more powerful due to their no longer needing to put points in their main stat. Im thinking specifically of the pacifist cleric who does no damage and can do some extreme things with a 20 in his secondary stat. Anyone...

Keterys that seems unclear to me. Do you like my houserule or not?

My new favorite houserule: The stunned (save ends) condition no longer exists. After the first failed save against the stunned condition, it becomes dazed (save ends)

Yeah, that first comment was entierly in jest. I'm actually more interested in the possibilities of what a monk can do with his hands since he does not need both for his attacks. EDIT Also My friend is playing Xenogears for the first time ever and he is quite upset at how good Citan is compared...

First off, just something I noticed: You seem entirely too angry in that last post, it might be my imagination, but that's what I see come across. The main difference in opinion here is on the answer to this question: Is minion purely a mechanical idea? My answer is yes, yours is no, I don't...