Search results

Hi, this is my Tiefling rogue: Seems like an elf with his short and slim form and pointed ears... But if looked carrefully at his cat-like eyes and two little horns, it is understood he is a Tiefling. He always hides his differences under the hood, mostly wearing black garbs. His nature is...

Anybody knows feat or something has change DR type? Like Dr5/Silver convert to Dr5/-

Also he is 20th level Barbarian and have DR 5/- his DR is stack or DR 4/Silver is useless?

Ok, if Thargor is shifter, and he has shifter defence, greater shifter defence feats. (DR 4/Silver) When he is shifting, how can I calculate his DR ?

and another prestige class from Deities & Demigods "Berserk"s battle fury ability?

Is "Righteous Wrath" benefits also count Frenzied Berzerker frenzy ability? and what do you think is it cheese?

Buckler drops his staff softly, and speaks calmly "Yes, Master Guardsman, my friend Adas has completely explained the situation."

Buckler points to the winged device "Did you see that?" Buckler kneels and examines inside the torso, where the small mechanical device should be attached to. K. (Engineering):1d20+3 "Maybe you are right Morphain, but..." [Can I repair her with "Repair Light Damage"?]

Buckler swings his staff. 1d20+3 1d6+4

"Sorry but I like these fleshlings lady" I am in charge. 1d20+5 1d6+4

Two quick questions. Which book in "Circlet of Use Magic Device"? Can I create crossbow firing grappling hook? Thanks.

"I don't like rain it's makes me rusty." Then he focused his staff and gently touched it. [Cast 1st Lvl. Infusion "Magic Weapon"]

Nightcrawler Appearance Wearing Cloak of the Bat, Moonstone mask and chain shirt.

Here is my warforged artificer: Name: Buckler Gender: Sexless Race: Warforged Age: 15 Height: 6´ 6´´ Weight: 200 lbs Class: Artificer 1 Level: 1 Alignment: LN 65 gp. Crossbow heavy 50 gp 40 bolts 4gp Quartestaff - Buckler 15gp Backpack 2gp Thieves' tools 30gp Artisan tools Alchemy...

No, in Eberron Campaign Setting artificer infusions are cast with intelligence. am I wrong? Is there any other errata overruling this?