Search results

Personally, I think the D&D brand is better served with a series a la Twilight Zone. i.e. Every episode is more or less unrelated to the other ones but in the same universe. That way you can explore the Forgotten Realms thoroughly, showing all the various tropes better than you could in a two...

Yeah, the D&D movie will come around when Warcraft 2 hits the silver screen.

Most of the Japanese stuff you mention, especially Ghost in the Shell, I don't think would fall under kid's shows. Neither would Archer. At least, I don't see that because it's animated, it would be suitable for kids.

A common trope in science fiction is using a type of propulsion which "bends" spacetime. Some have the idea that a ship could move at normal speed while contracting the space in front of it. Effectively reducing the distance it has to travel. Is this theoretically possible (with exotic matter)...

I got a little ahead of myself and didn´t read the last sentence. I´ll post it in the other thread.

A common trope in science fiction is using a type of propulsion which "bends" spacetime. Some have the idea that a ship could move at normal speed while contracting the space in front of it. Effectively reducing the distance it has to travel. Is this theoretically possible (with exotic...

Judge Dredd is drooling right now.

Maybe I'm nitpicking but I don't think the absence of believe in a deity is the same as having a believe that no deity exists. That would be the purview of anti-theists.

AAAAAAAH! Atheism is not a religion! That's a 50 dkp minus for you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPxs0Qh72kY

I think we're seeing a shift in both parties like back in the day. Republicans are going to be the democrats and vice versa. It's like a game of musical chairs except that, unfortunately, there are enough seats for everyone who had a chair to begin with.

I see the PC crowd has pressured you again. Where we come from we say "offensive term" not "term of offense".

Yeah, I understand it's about money. They would rather leave 300 new Abrahms tanks to rust in the desert than to do the right thing. But what I don't understand is how it can be legal. I get that you can be called up after service in times of need but having the terms of your contract changed...

What's the rationale for allowing military contracts to be unilaterally altered? I mean, is there a national security reason for it? It just seems, the way you describe it, that the government is seriously shafting the people that worked for them.

From across the pond. It's still kind of funny. Then I think about going back to the States and it's kinda sad. But for now...haha.

Equally frightening.

I have. Akira has a special place on my shelf.

Why has no-one hired a medium to speak with him so he can give his testimony? Am I the only one using my brain here?