Search results

I have done it several times. I will probably do it again. I say that because I had fun. They weren’t joke characters. Some had decent scores. In my experience, the more you have invested in creating a character the more things can impede your enjoyment. (Mind you this is not a guarantee.)...

After reading some of these responses I think that if Pathfinder 2e is easy to run I may give it a go. I would be impressed if the GM section had something new and/or useful. In my experience GM guides are about as useful as the screen.

Will PF2e have tons of splatbooks?

I think the comparison of damage is putting the cart before the horse. AOE spells do lots of damage IF there are multiple targets BUT would the targets exist if no AOE spells were there? Thus high damage is dependent on both possession of AOE and multiple targets. Also damage is often assumed...

D20 is like the Goldilocks of dice. D4-d12 maximum roll is too common. D100 is too rare. That’s why I like it. Plus D&D means d20 and d20 means D&D to me.

I think it was headed in the direction of board games. Wrath of A and Legend of Drizzt. I got both in the last couple of years and they compelled me to reevaluate 4e. I decided it was better than I gave it credit for being.

For me it’s notifications. They work better and you can stay with a thread easier.

I will be trying it.....but, So far we have made characters and that alone is enough for me to give it a hard pass. I do not like any of the design considerations. Nor the art direction. I am again confronted by a nagging suspicion that modern RPG’s “customization” is an illusion.

Easy peasy, make a drow that acts like a drow.

I voted 2e. It was a tough call between 2e and 3e. Mechanics wise they both have plusses and minuses. Lore for 2e is miles and miles ahead. Last but not least art direction. For me Elmore, Caldwell and Easley are tops. I have nothing nice to say about Wayne Reynolds style. 4e has become better...

The poll outcome looks like I would imagine. I also think it is very close to truth. Look up hero in the dictionary and the paladin’s picture is next to it. The bard is great but is closer to the scoundrel type imho.

This sounds cool. Too bad I missed it. And I have no AUD. Travis Henry Basic Basic D&D is there in D&D. A lot of people were taught D&D. Some taught themselves. No one gets it right. Not One. If you were lucky enough to start young chances are you grabbed some dice scribbled down some...

I’m in about the same area. My players are 16th going on 17th the things they can do are insane. I don’t think I will take them to epic but 20 sounds nice.

You may have your work cut out for you. If you have murder hobos. (John Carpenter’s Vampires comes to mind with their vampire hunters.) I think the movie Evil Dead might make the fey less twee. (Not Army of Darkness Ash but sawed of his own hand in desperation Ash.) Or Make the NPCs around...

That’s how bad the index is. The books are clearly designed to be read once and memorized. Until character generation then you must look it up. It’s downright Quixotic.

Apparently I already voted on this one some time ago. I wonder how I voted. If I were me I would...... I give up. I don’t know how I would vote. I don’t want to appear wishy-washy and contradict myself so my vote stands. All in favor say aye. Aye. The aye has it. Is there other business on the...

He then fired it through seven axe handles. Or at least the rings on the back which I would think needs a pretty strong draw to flatten the arc of the arrow. Unless they were very close together. I am not an archer so I don’t know.

I would say he has at least a 16 Strength and 16 constitution. Probably 18. The bow being one example he could string every time. His son could do it but it took 4 tries. None of the suitors could string it and it was twelve axe handles. He physically restrained at least three of his men I...

Ahh I see, fair enough.

Beowülf definitely deserves XP for using parabola. My IPhone doesn’t do what I want it to.