Search results

  1. C

    D&D 5E (2014) Monsters w/ Magic Items?

    You are confusing "humanoid" as in "shaped like a human" with "humanoid" as in the MM creature classification. They aren't the same thing, context matters. And I'm not sure why you think it's even relevant.
  2. C

    D&D 5E (2014) Hexblade - Two handers

    If you have the Hexblade patron, once you have gone Pact of the Blade, you can always use your Charisma with your Pact Weapon.
  3. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Or he might do the forum equivalent of putting his fingers in his ears and going "Lalalala....I can't hear you!" Continuing the theme of immaturity and childishness which has been the hallmark of this discussion. :)
  4. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    But it is not common to just kill their character for using a spell you don't like. At least I hope it isn't. :-S
  5. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Absolutely. And that holds equally true to this particular "discussion" - which is why I stopped caring about it awhile ago and started playing silly games like "Who get's the last word". Which I won by the way - he put me on ignore, which is a tacit admission of defeat. :cool:
  6. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Nope. You originally posted to brag about how you would purposely bully a player by targeting and killing their PC if you didn't like it instead of talking to them like an adult. i.e. throwing a DM Tantrum. That was settled awhile ago, no need to keep posting about it. You keep replying to...
  7. C

    D&D 5E (2014) Monsters w/ Magic Items?

    Absolutely. If they would reasonably use the item, they will use the item. And I only use CR as a loose guideline anyway (since I allow feats and multi-classing) so it's not a problem. If the monsters don't have magic items to use, I'll buff them in other ways to make them more...
  8. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Sure. But this does prove I was totally right about why you are posting. :cool:
  9. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Oh, I'm totally posting in order to get the last word.
  10. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Fun for you maybe. All I can say is that it sounds like anti-fun to me. You brag about making "challenges" that only target their weaknesses. Are there ever any challenges that involve something they are good at, or is that reserved for the characters that are built according to your pet...
  11. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Admit it, now you are just posting so that I don't get the last word.
  12. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Nah. Just don't care much anymore. I really don't know why he keeps responding to me. :) You must be new here. Great, we agree. Headhunting specific PC's is bad. Sure, and I even agree with you. But none of this is relevant to the point that was being discussed. It's a separate topic.
  13. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Someone sounds cranky. :)
  14. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Shh.... It's OK. The big bad DPR monster won't get you. You can stop fussing about it.
  15. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    I hear you man, loud and clear. You have limited skills as DM and can't handle anything complicated. It's OK, we all have to start somewhere. Preferably with less threats and DM tantrums, but whatever.
  16. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    We get it, you can't handle well built characters, they threaten your ego, so you throw a DM tantrum and kill them.
  17. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    Bragging about how you intend to kill a PC because their player is better at making a character than you are at running the game doesn't win you any respect. It just makes me feel sad for your players. And happy that I don't have to deal with you. :)
  18. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    You are lacking in basic reading comprehension then. To the point where I don't think you've actually been reading his comments and are just making things up in your head. :erm: It's not a single comment, it is several comments reiterating his intentions.
  19. C

    D&D 5E (2014) So Was That Z Fellow right?

    I have no idea what you are saying here. This is gibberish.
Top