Search results

Well you could talk about the topic instead.

That’s nice for features

They are not the only thing exclusive to the DMG. But you want several exclusives not just one.

Cause they want incentives for you to buy their books. Giving away most everything is nice, but it's still a good idea to hold some cards to attract people into buying your book.

Yeah this is more or less my view as well.

Why not make something more original instead of downgrading. You don’t even need the new SRD for your idea. Also would prefer to keep things compatible with Wizards stuff cause I actually want new D&D stuff. Cutting them out is counterintuitive.

Should point out that they are all getting more than 2 pages. The ToC shows the break down, but the Red Dragon is page 99 to 103 for example, so it gets four pages.

Well welcome

I just assume everything exists cause I see no reason to restrict myself.

This still is not a super solid source.

No clue what the player levels are so no way to judge that.

Conservatism: "commitment to traditional values and ideas with opposition to change or innovation." I have to wonder what materialist philosophies have altered the game, or how it's blander. Like I am serious the game has changed much less than you think.

Have you been using the new encounter guidelines and monsters?

Then no, nothing they currently release for D&D is acceptable to use AI in.

It very much depends on it's nature. Like I am not going to accept a book either written by AI or with it's art done by AI, basically a book is not something AI related I would get. Like the most acceptable thing is maybe a random map generator using some tilesets, or something that helps build...

And given that the books are selling well, the majority of players seem to like it anyway.

Wording is basically the same

Yes they could. But that wasn’t my point.

Well it seems odd to complain about 2024 stuff with an option not even made for it.

D&D books are not made with Chinese materials as far as I know.