Search results

Can't remember if the maul is one handed or not... it doesn't really matter either... what matters is where weight is located... With a Maul you're holding it close to the 'head' else you would need to hold it in too hands. With a Warmace.. the weight is located in the Head.. but you have to...

3.0 does seem better at disarm... it makes sence that its harder to lose/drop your weapon from a blow when holding it in 2 hands... more or less the same as its tougher to trip a monster with more than 2 legs...

I guess this isn't a 3.0 vs 3.5 battle topic. 3.0 really hold a better flavor overall... and there isn't that much that needs to be houseruled.. It all depend on the level of playing... if you're new to the system it doesn't matter that much which one you use, though 3.5 is certain alot easier...

btw, combat reflexes are limited to a number of AOO acording to your dex. Cleave is not

no I wouldn't allow it either... here's a good example: A Monk (with some feat from complete warrior granting him an additional attack on a critical) fighting 4 monsters, 2 of which are low on hp, one leaves his treat range fleeing. He gets the AOO and kills it, quickly cleaving the other...

Indeed. but there is a purpose for combat reflexes, for doing a thing as specificly as that. Another good point to consider is, that while make an AOO you are limited to certain combat actions, while in normal actions you are not. By getting an attack (that isn't really an AOO) against some...

If you are used to 2e.. i would clearly suggest 3.0 is it so much closer to 2e. I might even say that 3.0 and 3.5 is nearly as far apart as 2e and 3e.. the system is the same.. but htey are NOT the same in gameplay. 3.5 sacrificed alot of flavor and changed alot of things that's been the same...

But it will grant you additional attacks outside your turn. The only other way to get more attacks outside your turn is by taking combat reflexes, have a high dex, and fight supid opponents. Weather or not its intended by the SRD i would NEVER EVER allow a player to make a cleave as part of an...

The 3.5 seems too easy to overcome in many cases. It also seems unreal that 2 beasts of equal strenght cannot hurt eachother.. Think what would happen if we as humans didn't have a chance to kill eachother with normal means.. Welcome to Valhalla! fight and get rerived... oh no nvm.. you don't...

ehm you will have a problem about turning... if you start at a decent level you should be able to afford somekind of alter self or something that can alter your apperance more or less

Positive energy... So from now on high level wizards will be casting healing fireballs? Sonic isn't worth a +3 spell level... AT MOST +2...

I'd rule and interpretate the rules... so you can't awaken an awakened creature. It is giving them intelligence and a new personality with the random and new intel score. You can't make a tree more tree like. Or a living creature more living.. these are either or things. Either you have a...

We had a soulknife in our campaign too... and when they don't need to pay for their weapon they've got soo much more money for AC.. he had like 34 or 36 AC at level 10.. Never heard of an improved version though..

Why shouldn't the soulknife be good? First of all i think its rather strong 2nd of all.. you shouldn't choose a class from how good they are.. but from what you want to play...

Well.. its hard to have everything happen on the same time with so many characters fighting. Sure he could give the not paralyzes Barbarian a potion (he mgiht be able to even if the barbarian was paralyzes.. - dont know about that) Just describe it as the paralyzation is wearing off.. the...

Counting average damage per attack is like metagaming... sure we can do it here.. but i guess the players shouldn't get a whole season to calculate which item they want on how strong they are. Alot of players choose 'Burst' cause it looks cool, it does more than a normal flaming etc.. and its...

Haha.. sure you could... i bet a druid or a monk, a cleric.. or even a sorceror could too :)

Sure Pc's are able to beat CR + 2 encounters... but npc's aren't players.. and you can't expect the same from them. In a 'hard' and tough campaign.. more people will die... as you said leaving alot of high nps's there BUT... those dead still count against... How many npc's does it take for 1 of...

If ONE SINGLE npc were to adventure alone... he should fight monsters with a CR = level-2 to get a strong a challenge as a party with 4 Members get when fighting a Foe with CR = Level Btw.. this might not be easily calculated.. it has alot of variables.. a program or some dude with no life and...

8 years is FAST! but your calculation just countin those dying from the battles and the chance of it... im just very curious...