Search results

But obviously not to damage of powers? if 2W is JUST THE DICE... and STR is.. STR.. then where does enchantment bonuses come into play :) might seem weird to bicker about a "+1" to damage (from the example), but its waaay waay more considering some other 3W powers at higher levels with higher...

Then maybe a 3rd option is in place? 2[W] + str = 2d8+2(str) and no enchantment bonus then? Since it isn't mentioned anywhere? Their bad and useless examples and weird notations really bug me :/

This might be a noobish Question but i have seaches through alot of entries and examples and haven't found an answer yet: How precisely do you calculate the etc. 2[W] + str .?? Say you have a magic +1 Long Sword and 14 in str 1. Would you deal (1d8+1)+(1d8+1)+2(str) damage or 2...

To get down with it: Is the items Good?: Yes, Very Good.. Nice Item! Is it Broken?: No, not the Least.. Is it leveled/priced inapropritately?: It seems resenable fit for its level. Point to consider: 4e is a Team Game.. nearly seems like you cant run a proper encounter without it being a Team...

Now tell me again that i don't need a 'sword caddy' to be an effective player?

Only the first, except if he is flaking someone at the same time

What if the Glass is big, like a Water Tank? 'Bathtub?', Swimming pool? All these are artificial unlike the Usual Water enviroment defines ones. Again, I wouldn't consider a Vampire immersed in the water coming from an aquaduct for Deadly, however Running it might be. I don't think "Running"...

Flowing Water is not Equal to Running Water... By the definition they merely mean that a Vampire doesn't Drown if he sticks his finger into a Glass of Water... or the glass of Water is poured over him (Temporarily running or not) Hence It is, should be and my interpretation that any Aquatic...

You think of d&d as Computer Game... But rolepalying is so much more.. as stated there's no right or wrong, as Dungeon Master you can change things on the fly, as you please. Most importantly though, is that it is Fantasy.. Imagination ! DM: "The Smelly Green thing runs up to you and tries to...

Difference between Cold subtype, and Cold resistance :) They both resist cold, but only the first takes double damage from opposing element (Fire) Cold resist 1 or even 5 seems Perfect, and not the sleightest unbalancing.

hmm didn't the action work like Dross described in 3.0? and got altered in 3.5?

Easy: its turn based, you do what YOU want to do on YOUR turn. Hence, you make all your attacks when its your time to do so. After you are done, the initiative moves on and the orcs do whatever they want to do on their turn. Ones actions are NOT split up over the round, like you seem to imply...

In general heighten Spell feat could offer a fine solution

Do you need heighten spell to make it cost more? Else the "level" part seems mis leading. Maybe you should add a section "This spell can be prepared at higher levels for a greater effect" ?

in a fullplate and furthermore somehow both have DR... or The Fullplate provides DR ? If the last is the case, then its a houserule, and to solve the problem, a post in the houserule forum might help you tweak the rules for your convenience.. Anyway... For the 2nd Case, the knights DR doesn't...

Where do you get the DR from? Armor DR? Self made rules?

The Question didn't go on making the dragon "as strong as possible"... There's no need for min maxing here... Imo fighter levels fits the 'theme' of the dragon encounter waaaay better than barbarian levels. Depending on the dragon ofc, i couldn't really see most dragons fly into a Rage... and...

Go with fighter levels, they are the most ideal to use... Will also give benefit of feats. Enjoy

If you're dying to an invisible opponent, then its always worth it, even if it took a fullround action to locate him ! Very nifty feat this.

i woulds say 2k is too low. 4000 seems better to me. Could be reflected by tweaking the "newly made" spell into giving 5 resist at lvl 2 etc. (some kind of progression etc.)