Search results

And what is the definition of the d&d fighter? Looks like the designers of the next d&d also have some difficulty defining it: Whoops! Browser Settings Incompatible

And the PHB races should be simple, half a page or something like this, the fluff information shoul be in the settings book.

The game would be better without them? They are interesting races, the game is better with them, even if only they give more mechanical option to build a character.

D&D needs more variety, even skyrim have lizard and feline races, and it is a very tradicional computer RPG. I have 32 years and my d&d more influenced by videogames than Tolkien and I know that is like this for many people.

Stances are cool because they are tactical choices, like you need more damage or AC this round? Like the essentials fighters I can see stances being the fighter "thing"in 5e.

Well I think the other way, it work fine in 4e because is just other power but not in 2e and 3e (the ones I played) because uses a unique mechanic, particularly a mechanic that depends of a table.

If you have to check a table it is not fine... Turn undead is simple to implement and shouldn't be different from a spell as it is basically fear that works only on undead.

Well to me the 4e tiefling is better, as a PC race at least, because it is a specific civilization corrupted by devils and not a generic plane touched. It have a cool Melnibonean feel to me. A more generic planetouched should be a template or theme.

i don't like half races at all.

well I like the 4e dragons way better (I really like 4e monsters) and dont like the "casts as a xx level sorcerer" from 3e, nor the "casts spells x, y and z". I really think that monster should have unique powers.

I really like the first adventure of this AP but don't want to dm d&d right now, the first adventure works very good using savage worlds rules, but you think that the other work? Some things aren't so good in savage worlds, particularly the pcs against a single boss monster.

I think that the damage should go up and the fighter can use this attacks against more opponents, it would be easier to balance.

I wouldn't mind multiple attack with the same bonus (like 2 @ -2 and 3 @ -5) I realy don't like the 3.5 multible attacks nor the fractional attacks from 2e.

It is confuse yes, maybe if spell "level" uses another name...

But in the pool some people voted for this, she is right to be upset...

I'm alsot sure that the modifiers are stat-10 now, it is simple and clean.

I agree, same mechanics to all.

d% is good for DM random tables, and that is it.

I really dislike the fact that the casting mechanics are diferent from attacks, a missed oportunity to make a more unified game. One more cool thing from 4e that is abandoned in 5e.

Yet many here say that healing surges and warlord break the verisimilitude for them... go figure.