Search results

A literally weaker version of the Dueling Fighting Style is amazing?

Crawford is REALLY hyping up that +1 avg. damage over any other sword-and-board user in the game. That doesn't fill me with a whole lotta confidence about this UA.

But still only 1 extra point of damage on average over any other sword-and-board wielder. That is just inadequate compared to push or slow every round.

One extra point of damage on average over a standard sword-and-board wielder compares to push or slow every round, or an extra attack every round, how exactly?

Flex is magnitudes weaker than everything else, and of course the longsword is stuck with that. So the longsword gets done dirty yet again.

I'd go one further than that and just make saving throws universally and fully proficient. And just let the differences in ability scores between classes be the difference in saving throws. Think about it, at level 17+ (+6 proficiency) with a 10 in the stat, you still only succeed 40% of the...

I completed the survey. Marked disapproval on a lot of it. The Druid, I see the direction it's going and it could work, but it needs A LOT of work to get there. And the Paladin is just a weak version of the Cleric now.

Yeah, that was bewildering, to say the least. People used tiny shapes for scouting, and that's it.

So basically you liked the 5e PHB Ranger as it was, and that's why you hate the new Ranger. You'd at least better acknowledge that you are in the very small minority on this.

The Warrior packet in April is going to determine once and for all whether OneD&D is worth investing any more time and energy in. I have a feeling it will indicate very strongly that it will not be worth it at all.

With Clerics casting Smite spells and Find Steed better than Paladins do, Paladins are literally just bad Clerics now.

You ... are aware smite has been limited to once per turn, right?

My guess is that they will make a new, more restrictive, license entirely separate from OGL for OneDnD/5.5/6e/whatevertheycallit. Similar to what they tried with 4e. goes back to eating my crow doused in apple vinegar

There can be a conversation on how WOTC and Hasbro can regain trust in the future, but it absolutely cannot be with the current management. At the very least Cynthia Williams needs to be shown the door, and preferably Chris Cocks, Tim Fields, and Dan Rawson, as well.

I'd say Wizards' statements are the untrustworthy thing here, not the 2.0 leak.

Can't wait to see what new insidious BS they attempt to slip in on us. Stay vigilant, is all I can say. Also, any announcement that doesn't include the words to the effect of "Cynthia Williams, Chris Cocks, and Tim Fields have been relieved of their duties" is useless to me at this point.

Not sure about lifetime, but definitely for as long as the current management is at Hasbro/WOTC.

Hasbro and WOTC needs to fire every suit involved in devising and pushing this new OGL, and publicly announce those firings, name by name. That's the first step of many they need to take.

Game over, WOTC and Hasbro. Their greed was their undoing. Serves them right. OneD&D is dead on arrival. No sense continuing to playtest that. Everyone move on to Pathfinder 2e.

It uses the reaction system, but it doesn't actually use up your reaction.