Search results

  1. H

    Hasbro won't back off from deauthorizing the OGL, and nor should they.

    They "won" in the sense that maybe they don't see massive boycotts of their movie.
  2. H

    Matt Colville weighs in.

    Wonder what Matt thinks about the latest news?
  3. H

    Now that this is over (for now at least) What are you going to do?

    It's all right but it can't replace the original for me.
  4. H

    Beholders, Mind Flayers, and Strahd von Zarovich Released Into Creative Commons (Kinda)

    You could probably get away with a Medium sized Cthulhu - green, and flabby, with vestigial wings and a mas of facial tentacles. You can't make it purple with four tentacles around a toothy maw.
  5. H

    Now that this is over (for now at least) What are you going to do?

    Push for more. I'd like to get all past editions (but especially 4e) released under the CC license.
  6. H

    Beholders, Mind Flayers, and Strahd von Zarovich Released Into Creative Commons (Kinda)

    So I can commercially publish my Mickey/Strahd gay erotica finally?
  7. H

    WotC Backs Down: Original OGL To Be Left Untouched; Whole 5E Rules Released as Creative Commons

    Curiouser and curiouser. Makes me even more convinced they want to use MtG IP.
  8. H

    I'm beginning to dislike Netflix (re: Archive 81, 1899, Warrior Nun etc cancellations)

    Yeah, it's dead at CW. Can take it elsewhere but basically back at square 1.
  9. H

    WotC Backs Down: Original OGL To Be Left Untouched; Whole 5E Rules Released as Creative Commons

    WizBro doesn't have any control over the CC license whatsoever.
  10. H

    Cubicle 7 Also Announces A New 'C7d20' System

    Damn it was right in front of us all along
  11. H

    Critical Role Issues Statement

    Or they have a sponsorship deal with D&D Beyond (now part of Wizards of the Coast) that includes a non-disparagement clause.
  12. H

    Cubicle 7 Also Announces A New 'C7d20' System

    They can do better.
Top