Search results

Artificer was created in 3.x which explicitly had item creation rules. It worked pretty well in 4e as well, as a "your powers temporarily enchant everyone's weapons/armor or create single-use gizmos" deal

"Because we have expensive lawyers on retainer and you don't."

I think you just can't.

Explain how you arrived at this conclusion.

Yes maybe you misread a word in my post.

Please explain how you arrived at this conclusion in detail

Exactly

Hey cool you can join them

Assuming that firing Chris Cao won't prevent future harm is incredibly flawed logic.

Ok. And there's a consequence to you saying that. Care to guess what it is?

With all due respect - you are not the language police.

3 episodes 4 times a year would be just about perfect honestly.

Wow! You'd have to be some kind of moron to turn that down!

Wizards could offer to re-up, but I'm sure by that point they'd have little incentive to do so.

The entire contract was limited to 2 years, including the 15%.

Thank God we have [ERR:BLOCKED_USER] to tell us all what a great deal this is, because Kobold Press and MCDM just don't have their great business sense.

Or just include API access in the contract.

Buying out DM's Guild and integrating it with DDB and Sandcastle would make a lot of sense.

Contracts were 2 years, and granted the following: Pay 15% instead of 25% on revenue over 750k 6 articles about your product on D&D Beyond 6 emails about your product to D&D Beyond users 8 social media posts on D&D Beyond or D&D branded channels 2 YouTube videos on D&D Beyond or D&D branded...

Lack of a license doesn't stop me from playing 4e on Foundry.