Search results

That, actually, is quite arguable.

Hey baby, you want to kill all humans?

There's a passing mention of how one can develop your own maneuvers, disciplines, etc much in the same way you can do personal spell research. That needs to be developed more. Guidelines, etc for what's appropriate at each level. I want to develop a fighting style that's based on Mimics...

Point of curiosity, but why an AoO?

Nah, that would be your fist. :p

Publish. Seriously.

It requires some careful handling on the part of the DM. I mean it is the only feat to have a warning label on it, after all. Done right though, it can be fun. One of the best uses I've seen to date was when the rogue character in our game took the feat, had the cohort (the ever-awesome...

I'm in a similar boat to PC. I was very trepidatious at first, thought it was going to be a really bad example of power inflation, etc. In the end, I love it. It lets melee characters do a lot more now than just swing.. hit.. damage, etc. It used to be if you wanted to pull off cool special...

The long and short of it is: Don't try to get infinite storage by nesting extradimensional storage devices, or the universe will punish you. Don't try to abuse it and you should be fine.

Nor shall you. Thanee's quantum gendered.

Not if there's a little Wil in all of us. *nod* Told ya so.

If the paladin is supposed to be the living embodiment of that god's will... ... why did he have a choice, then? May as well just tell the paladin that self-preservation is the sign of a fit mind, and thus not wanting to go on any missions means that he is fit to go on missions.

Once you're dead, you're officially off the hook as far as the whole duty thing goes. You can go back if you want to, by all means, but you're no longer required to give your all for the good fight... because you already did... hence why you're dead now.

I am not Spartacus. But I am Wil Wheaton. Er, wait...

*cough* No, of course not. Noting at all. :D

Does it count is there's a little Wil Wheaton in all of us?

Which we shall dub the Factmeleon.

You know, I'm pretty sure I've seen a "Rod of Bull's 'Blood'" for sale before. Must've been made by the same guy, they look so similar.

I think that actually qualifies as a misuse of the Book of Erotic Fantasy. That's hard to do, hong. Bravo!

Nope.