Search results

  1. rgard

    Listening to old-timers describe RP in the 70s and 80s

    I hear that. Our group played the same characters in several campaigns from 1979 through 1983. Some time in 1980 we found out that one of the players started his cleric at 7th level. His best friend played a magic-user and fighter of 8th level or so when the cleric was created and I suspect...
  2. rgard

    Sell me on (or out) Traveller

    We played in the late 70s, early 80s with the LBB. It was a hoot. We rotated GM responsibilities. We all rolled characters until one of us rolled up an octegenarian (ok, that's an exageration) who mustered out with a scout ship. Lots of characters died during character creation. It was a...
  3. rgard

    AD&D 1E How about a little love for AD&D 1E

    I did an actual dual class human. Did 10 levels of fighter, then changed classes to magic-user. The character was hard to kill.
  4. rgard

    AD&D 1E How about a little love for AD&D 1E

    I did one, but not the way it was intended. In the first campaign I was in back in 1979, the DM allowed anybody to multi-class. Your character got experience by doing class related things. Magic Users got XPs for casting spells, thieves for stealing stuff, clerics for casting spells and...
  5. rgard

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    Which devil? My name is Legion: for we are many.
  6. rgard

    D&D Movie/TV Here Come The D&D Movie Gaming Tie-Ins!

    So? Chris Pine's character gets eaten by a gelatinous cube? Major spoiler.
  7. rgard

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    I suspect how well the movie does will have nothing to do with bringing more people and creators to the hobby. The best they can hope for is a few D&D players bringing non-D&D people to see the movie and maybe getting the non-players to agree to buy a players handbook and play the game. As you...
  8. rgard

    It is time to forgive WOTC and get back onboard.

    "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
  9. rgard

    WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All

    Funny thing is that if they hadn't tried to pull this crap with the OGL, I would have gone to the theater to see the movie. Not now.
  10. rgard

    WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All

    Wizards of the Coasting.
  11. rgard

    WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All

    Reality is businesses remove underperforming staff all the time. They backfill those positions with new staff they think will do a better job based on previous work and the interview process.
  12. rgard

    WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All

    They pay designers to write the stuff. If the stuff doesn't sell, you change your staff and until you have a team that does write stuff that sells.
  13. rgard

    WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All

    The way you fix that is to write better adventure and setting books.
  14. rgard

    WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All

    I guess I better get crackin' on writing some stuff using the original OGL.
  15. rgard

    WotC Walks Back Some OGL Changes, But Not All

    "Second, you’re going to hear people say that they won, and we lost because making your voices heard forced us to change our plans. Those people will only be half right. They won—and so did we." Petty.
  16. rgard

    OGL-Gate & Mainstream Media: The Guardian Weighs In

    That's where Americans go to get their US news. :)
  17. rgard

    Paizo Announces New Irrevocable Open RPG License To Replace the OGL

    Yes on trademark and not copyright, but there is a statute of limitations on bringing a lawsuit.
  18. rgard

    Paizo Announces New Irrevocable Open RPG License To Replace the OGL

    Agreed, but it's not like WotC vigorously protected that IP over the past 20+ years.
  19. rgard

    Paizo Announces New Irrevocable Open RPG License To Replace the OGL

    I think it means we'll have several system reference documents to choose from.
Top