Search results

Soulmelds are not equipment, they are class abilities. A Druid/Totemist or Druid/Incarnate has weaker spells and wildshapes than a single classed Druid of equivalent level. They deserve to be able to use the abilities they gave up druid advancement for. Would you deny a Druid/Sorcerer...

There already is one for Dragons in the Draconomicon, the Dragon Ascendant. It could be used as a basis for a similar class (or group of classes) for humaniods.

If you are going to take True Necromancer take it first when the spell-likes will still be relevant. Human Wizard 3/Cloistered Cleric 3/True Necromancer 14 Or Dwarf Wizard 2/Cleric 3/Runesmith (RoS) 1/True Necromancer 14 If the game goes Epic think about Mystic Theurge then.

They work fine unless maybe you take a form that doesn't have the magic item slot they are associated with, then I don't know. Most animals and elementals have the same magic item slots as humanoids.

Divine Gestures and No Familiar are exactly the thing that the designing new flaws sidebar in Unearthed Arcana says is absolutely disallowed for flaws. double check them with your DM. Death is not a domain you want, it's ability is weak and highly dependent on cleric level, and its spells are...

There are no rules for negative level adjustments, so warforged have to muddle along underpowered. They are really cool though.

3.0 No, 3.5 yes.

Makes sense but Moradin and and Yondala both fill important roles not filled by any other core diety, leaving them in the combined panteon makes sense.

In this case it it because the rapier is a Diamond Mind form weapon and the character in question has a feat that privileges those weapons over others, and is a Diamond Mind specialist anyway.

That'll teach me to depend on my memory of 3.0 without checking if it's changed. But I note a distinct lack of text saying that the rapier is an exception to the rule that 1 handed weapons wielded in 2 hands add twice the number subtracted from your attack rolls when power attacking.

Yes, Yes, and No respectively. Skip addresses all of this in the article I just linked to.

I've read Call of Chtulhu. I've read (a translation of) the french legend thet the Tarrasque came from. Ten of Cthulhu would stand no chance at all against the Tarrasque.

I just looked up this dispute in the archives of the Rules of the Game articles on the Wizards website. And Skip Williams addresses almost every point under contention here: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/rg/20060905a

You'll forgive me if I don't see what purpose it serves to house rule the weakest fighting style in the game to be weaker and more complicated and cumbersome.

No Yes No

I'd up the skill requirement, 3rd is a little to early to be qualifying for this kind of PrC. what soulbinds/ class abilities did it grant? Also I think we are using different assumptions in our abreviations, if you look at the first post you should see what I meant. it looks like your...

The entry requirement of your class are much stricter than the Anima Mage, Sapphire Hierarch, Soulcaster, Mystic Theurge etc. either one of that or the 8/10 progression would make it an overly weak class without insanely good class abilities. Both are crippling.

It can.

Potions, Scrolls, Staves and Wands cannot be repaired at half price. I think it would cost him the same to repair any of those limited charge items as it would to make new ones. But otherwise you seem to be right.

But if it ended when your action did it would be almost meaningless. As I said. No similar clause exists for two weapon fighting.