Search results

"Changing stuff into other stuff" is a pretty wide catchall, to be sure.

Again: Walls don't generally fight back. A commoner with an adamantine dagger and some time on his hands could do it.

Indeed.

11-20 he can do whatever he wants. I'd suggest dispel magic.

Why are the divine books always the messiest?

They should hire google.

In a boot slot I'd say 10k but only if it affected base speed only. So a halfling monk20 would only get +20' out of it. Also I would make sure that you name the bonus, to avoid stacking silliness.

Note that since these are TV characters, not game characters, PL is descriptive, not prescriptive. The reason I point this out is that it appears that no one EVER successfully makes a saving throw against each other's powers. Now this could mean every power has a "No Save" extra, or the DC's...

Well in that case, then yes it would work fine. As it is, a sorcerer who only has one spell slot open of his highest level and nothing else and had a number of different reserve feats could use any of them. Or if say you had a spell that was a summoning [Fire] spell it would qualify both for...

Regarding the literary interpretation debate: I am completely against literary interpretation, especially in the case where an author is still alive and kicking an able to answer the questions as to what he actually intended. Of course you're still free to make your own interpretations. They...

I have a quick question. "This spell functions like polymorph, except that it changes one object or creature into another." Does this general sentence override the normal restrictions on Polymorph of limited creature types and HD limits? Our group is currently playing it as allowing ANY...

In that case, I would say no. I personally don't count spontaneous conversion as the same as having the spell prepared. Based on the previous poster: A cleric is a prepared caster, so would fall under point 1. He needs to actually prepare the spell. Even if you considered him spontaneous...

I can't think of two reserve feats that would work off flame strike, but yes the sorcerer example works just fine.

The default "official" answer from CustServ is that this doesn't work.

I thought there was a FAQ question which addressed the issue for druids who took the elemental summoning feat, and wondering if being able to spontaneously cast SNA would qualify for it? Maybe it wasn't a FAQ question, but a CustServ response. Either way, I'm fairly certain that they...

It is also will negates, not half.

That is another thing: I'd rather have a DM say to me "I know what the rule says and how it applies. I just think that is stupid for XXXXX reason, and instead we're doing it YYYYYY way." The problem is too many "interpretrive" DMs don't even know the base answer first.

I always favor the RAW first, unless something is ridiculously stupid. The reason being that this keeps everyone on the same page, and everyone knows what to expect. As soon as you start making ad hoc rulings based on "realism" and "logic" the game starts breaking down, I've found. That being...

What he said. Do not feel beholden to other people's work.

His psionic powers will work normally.