Search results

I repeat my previous answer. I see no reason one should be better than the other in a whole pillar of the game. I actually think the opposite here: sitting at a table, the sorcerer will look down at his character sheet and see lots of cool features, while the wizard won't. In the past, this...

No, I meant what I wrote. But in an effort to engage in good faith, I'll consider the following: I have had relatively few sorcerers when compared to wizards in all my tables over the years. It is a less popular archetype. They always felt appropriately interesting and useful at my tables, but...

Does the sorcerer need to be better than the wizard in a whole pillar of the game? I'd say that disparities in power are especially noticeable in combat, where the initiative system slows things and everyone gets a clearer glimpse at their toolbox. It may be a self-fulfilling prophecy (most...

They were a bit worse before. Under the new rules, the difference will be quite stark. In a random high-level one-shot, I can see the Wizard player getting quite frustrated that every other caster seems to be contributing much more than he is. A swiss army knife is only good if you both know...

I would like to add the perspective of someone who almost never plays a Wizard (I almost never play anything, I'm a DM 99.9% of the time). I run games quite often: I have a couple of weekly home games, and I run additional ones in the game store and for other friends fairly frequently. I am...