Search results

exactly. Which is why I'm confused why the answer to potential of a bad DM is "change the rules to take DM's power away", but the answer to a potential bad player is "that's an individual table issue, that cannot be fix at game design level. Run a session zero and talk to the player". Shouldn't...

well it is only fair to ask you for proof.

No, it's very clear to me that this person is presenting a clear example what not to do in a humurous, sarcastic way. You just choose to see them as sincere because you lacked an argument and making a strawman was easier than actually searching for a geniue example. Some real "I think Coolville...

Then you need to learn to better communicate your ideas. From my perspective, I literally grabbed first nearest post and you started bending over backwards to say why they don't count. I don't feel like playing the game where you are set off from the beginning to dismiss every example. From...

He said so in an interview when this was announced

You do realzie this psot is blatantly a joke, right? This is someone being sarcastic.

Dude, you yourself wrote something like this: You made a strawman of other person's argument and built a strawman that requires the assumption DM WILL be a tyrant and players WILL be iunnocent to actually be effective scaremonger you are using it for. I don't feel like looking up whole thread...

The thing is, yhis whole thread is full of people with opposite assumption - players are never at fault, dm always is. Why the double standard?

But it does return to the point of why the discourse seems to treat actions of priblempayer as something to be dealt with on personal, individual level, but actions of problem DM as inherent problem of all DMs that has to be tixed on rules level.

Why would a dm ruling be inherently tyranical? In my game whenever there is a conflict of opinions over rules, we operate on "I make the call niw to not easte time, we can check it after the game and if I was wrong, we will use correct rule in the future". Is that tyranical?

More or less same. New Drow enclaves wasn't WotC, Salvatore claims he's been pushing for this idea for years but WotC only let him recently.

How?

So, does the book state how much time should pass between long ress?

If I was writing this description I would not want to call to attention how messed up it it Drizzt knew his wife sinc she was a child, but I guess I'm not writing blurbs for audible.

I don't care. AI is trained on stolen work of real artists, therefore use of AI is theft. I'm from Europe, we generally think Americans are crazy for not having gun control anyway. It cannot. AI always drives towards most common denominator, so everything it ever creates is inherently generic...

Am I going to assume you're not going to engage with my points either?

You have put words in my moth, and then ignored me when I pointed it out, you know?

Again, that is something that calls for session zero, not stripping GM from power but refusing to take responsibility that comes with it.

I assume it stands for Am I the A-hole, reddit sub where people say their stories if they need second opinion on whenever they were at fault in a situation.

And I did not said that, I have said you want to transfer power from GM to players, but I didn't hear a word about you wanting to also transer the responsibility.