Search results

All serious tho, the dmg was supposed to prove WotC doesn't consider 's obsolete, so having something written in a way to disempower the dm and seemingly make thing easy for ai to handle is not a good sign.

It's off limits to the DM because it would be too hard for AI DM on d&d beyond that WotC wants to replace us with.

I would rule that Shadow drains base Strength, but he dosn't feel ut due to the belt keeping it at 24. If his Strength goes to 0, he dies the moment he takes the belt off

Yes, I know, been considering doing side by side comparison of the three, once I have more time

It's a shame, since Monk is the class I always have most interest in, but I should give a look to Ranger and Warlock

I am considering to see how it compares to 5.24 and A5e, first impression was the Monk and it wasn't that impressive, at least at first glance, will see how other classes compare

Then it's settled, we don't need Half-Elves or Half-Orc because they have watered down relatability and experience as humans and Elves or Orcs. It was a goid choice to provide theirplae to Tieflings and Goliaths, wish Goblins or Kobolds got in too. Now when that's settled, I consuder my job...

It literally says Hobbits are humans' closer relatives than Elves and Dwarves, which equals saying the latter are humanity's distant relatives. If being humanity's relatives makes you human, Elves and Dwarves are human. Or it doesn't and all 3 are separate races. Except the argument Hobbits are...

This effectively says Elves and dwarves qre just more distant relatives of uman. Congratulations, Middle Earth has no races, it's all just different variety if humans!

No, but Kobold Press 5e books did.

I hope you're wrong

And we're back to making up bullmanure claims. Hobbits are not humans unless you show me on page Tolkien explicit writing down they are, and even then i'll consider it bad form from him. If Hobbits can be relatable, even if you want to use the stupid term "functiomally human", it is not the same...

Every timeI think this lore could not get dumber, it does

Then why is its type "humanoid"?

I was daing i do not accept distinction beteeen monsters and npcs and pointed to generic npcs like Warlord being in monster books as a case that books support my position. For me everything not controlled by a player is an NPC

I could see the Hobbit starring Pooh as Bilbo, tbh. You still haven't answered why Hobbits cannot be in Dwarf basket, you know? Or maybe Hobbit happens when Elf and Dwarf have a baby? Is there anything in the lore confirming Hobbits are humans aside you reading there are three races and...

How is warlord and abjurer being in Volo's guide to monters s "new demon lore"?

Considering generics npcs are put in monster books, this is a distinction without difference.

This is still a headcanon without evidence and assumption you expect everyone to make. Maybe Hobbits are related to Dwarves, for example? And it still doesn't change the fact that insisting only humans can be relatable turns every relatable creature in fiction into humans. If Hobbits are...

I do think it was a horrible movie about Mighty hitey coming to another culture and instantly becoming the best at it, pretty in my opinion.