Search results

That is an incredibly bad positon that effectively dehumanizes the people of "different culture"

I could focus on that incredibly bad Last Samurai example.

And people also like Kobolds, but you've been treating me like I'm stupid for liking them

That's nice headcanon, but that's all it will ever be. Hobbits origins aren't in Sirmaillion because Tolkien didn't think of the Hobbit as set in Middle Earth until he decide to write Lord of the Rings, that's all.

The argument was and still is that Hobbits in Fellowship are more relatable than humans, despite not being humans. You drew arbiyrary lines in sad ehat is and isn't relatable, lines that contradict themselves, and you in paticular have disturbing hatred to anything that doesn't look like you...

And I hate all of them and felt insulted by having to discuss that character in context of hobby I picked to not have to deal with that garbage?

Good thing then we're not talking about Batman, but dnd, no matter how much fanatics of that intellectual parasite try to change it. Spare me moral posturing in defense of a franchise abput rich fascist's vendetta against the disfranchised.

I don'y look down on them because Batman is silly, my reasons to hate the character are far mre complex than that

Why ypu come to my vinegar parol, asking for honey?

Firstof sll, Gnoll type is humanoid, ypu are literally making claims contraty to the canon. Ypu are so desperate to draw an arbirar line between playable and nonplayable, you directly contradicted the lore you're allegedly defendng. Gnoll on Eberron are not born of Yeenoghu, since he is not...

You actually neede a time to think how to move the goalpost again and how to yry to gaslight me here, didn't you?

Do ypu're running in circles, are you aftaid of admitting you made a mistake this much?

1. This literally flips the bird to Eberron, which does all races with a twist. So now Eberron doesn't count? Now any setting where Gnolls aren't inherently mindless monsters spawned from blood of a specific demon lord, is doing dnd wrong? 2. Last pragraph once again destroys the idea of playing...

What ideology is that, care to share with the class?

Why not? You realized we stepped into a bigger problem that the line of thinkingyou employ may lead to, maybe?

All aspects of species are dctated by the setting, ypu effectively demand forcing one idea as "biologicsl default" on all worlds, infinite potential and creativity be damned. This is how we got garbage that were 2014 Gnolls, where books were claiming every gnoll in every world is exactly the...

I'm not sidestepping, I will come back to the pist later. I still want to jnow why you think it was remotelly ok to put a group of real people in one bracked wih made up cteatures of fantasy and sci-fi. Japan is a real place, full of real people, you know that, right?

Did you really just put Japanese people into one bracket with blue aliens and talkig racoons?

What setting? If LotR then please show me any evidence of that, when Tolkien told us clearly all races were created, he didn't explain origin of Hobbits because they weren't originally meant to be part of Middle Earth, he added them later. But they were clearly not counted among the Men. There...

exactly.