Search results

Sure in your videos I'll give you that but here it's much less clear... especially with a post like the OP of this thread.

You must be from the future then because you're judging a book that hasn't been released yet. Moreso you're judging its usability without having seen it used in the wild... so yeah stating book A is better than book B without ever having seen Book B... I'd call that disparaging it. And if not...

Did you or did you not throw in a line about it being less useful than Monstrous Menagerie? Without stating any basis for said oppinion and with the book not having been released yet? What relevance did that line even have to our discussion... to show the fair and non biased way you judge books??

Here we go... MM isn't even out yet but you had to disparage it for...well I'm not sure for what particular purpose in this post but hey it's your ( mostly uninformed) oppinion.

Because you're not actively pushing for people to drop or stop playing TotV....are you? On the flipside you've had no problem doing that for D&D both here and on your channel for awhile now. Does that answer your question?

I used to be a big fan of Slyflourish (especially his Shadowdark run of videos) but recently he has, IMO, been leaning more and more into anti-WotC rhetoric (especially after the PHB blur issues). Now I get it, you're trying to make your money but let's be upfront and transparent about that as a...

And in the nature of being open and more upfront I think it would be a better look if the OP @SlyFlourish was clear and upfront that outside of his own 5e products, some of which compete directly with WotC products, that he has also been a financially compensated contributor to TotV (another...

I'm honestly more shocked that people are dismissing the statements of the person actually affected and being more outraged than they are... I guess for them...

Nope and I'm purely stating facts... at level x a fighter is given the title superhero... across multiple iterations.l of early D&D.

Yep... now go back and you'll see i said both were creative in different ways... so again what is your point?

So you were there... right?

If you think I criticized them you're not following the conversation.

They are descriptive titles of the class... including mechanics... at said level. It certainly shows us what the designers thought the class was best represented but at that level.

Rem8nd me again in what editions was the Fighter called an actual superhero at later levels?

So... not the most creative choice...right?

What was my question? Better yet what was the claim that I was questioning...

I didnt claim otherwise... And your point here is?? Uhm... we were talking about WotC and 3pp specifically... so again I'm not sure what your point is...

So I'm curious what do you think of a company like Kobold Press... who have none of those same pressures and yet for all intents and purposes published a slightly tweaked copy of D&D 5e... what do you think of their creativity? Are they just making the game they want... and if so why is it so...

You stated it like it was a given though.

What's the playstyle?