Search results

  1. C

    How to kills a dragon... Help with a Warforged Juggernaut build?

    Actually, it's neither. It's just that the developers designed Mot9 to be entered with straight swordsage from the looks of it, and it takes a bit of work to get in otherwise, but there's no loophole or lack of clarity. In fact, the ToB PrC rules are quite clear. Don't. It's a bad idea. You need...
  2. C

    Why are undead inherently evil?

    Except it's very difficult to become an intelligent undead safely and in a way that leaves you relevant. Liches require you to be a relatively high-level spellcaster and be willing to screw with your own soul, not to mention be Evil, ghosts require you to be a wizard to actually matter much...
  3. C

    How to kills a dragon... Help with a Warforged Juggernaut build?

    This is the Idiot Crusader. Basically, you qualify for Mot9 with levels of Crusader. This works best if you dip in the Unarmed Swordsage variant and use flaws, but the end result is your maneuvers refreshing every turn. WRT, or White Raven Tactics, basically lets an ally take an extra turn...
  4. C

    How to kills a dragon... Help with a Warforged Juggernaut build?

    What books are available? Honestly, killing dragons without spellcasting is a pain. I'd honestly try to work an WRT-abusing Idiot Crusader into the build, although a simple charger is effective if the dragon isn't prepared. Honestly, ToB is your best bet, even if you don't like WRT or Idiot...
  5. C

    Why are undead inherently evil?

    They are Evil because the system of morality in D&D is completely objective. This is made painfully obvious if you compare BoED and BoVD, where we learn that poisons are inherently Evil, but you can get Good totally-not-poisons-why-do-you-keep-calling-them-that to meet all the effects you want...
  6. C

    Is it possible to build a Dragoon?

    If you don't mind my asking, why not? Psionics and Bo9S are mostly quite-well balanced(Or in psionics case, at least in comparison to other types of magic). Regardless, the psionics in the builds are mostly unnecessary. You can cut it out from most of them with little loss in functionality. Up...
  7. C

    Tumble too powerful?

    Sure, but now they're completely invincible. And the specific effects of the spell are metagame, too. I hardly see a problem. Actually, it isn't. The errata explicitly states you can cast it while flat-footed. It breaks flat-footed. Nope. Because my finding it absurd is RAW, and your objection...
  8. C

    The problem is choice

    Nope. I'm using precisely your reasoning, for lack of a better word. Except it wouldn't. So you're saying that the system isn't capable of using material created for the system? That totally makes perfect sense. And I really need a rolleyes smiley. And whoever has argued that is wrong. Hardly...
  9. C

    Tumble too powerful?

    I hear Contingency is a cool spell you know. As I said, casters always win initiative. Yes, but that's absurd enough I refuse to take that into consideration, just as I view talking as a way to break Flat-Footed, or the concentrated mass of idiocy and poor design that is the Psionic Artificer...
  10. C

    The problem is choice

    Okay. I now officially rule that nobody can play anything with intelligence above three and any attack action that has an average damage different from 11.5 is prohibitted. Is that right? Does the system agree with that sort of play? Of course not. Your line of reasoning is inane. Oh, a "no u."...
  11. C

    Tumble too powerful?

    Oh, man, poorly-constructed personal attacks and inability to read rules? How could I ever question such brilliance?
  12. C

    Tumble too powerful?

    You mean that someone would actually try to play Pun-Pun? You're... You're joking, right? I couldn't see any other context that makes sense, because Pun-Pun is stupid and no context makes sense.I can't believe that even the most messed in the head nut would try to use it in a game.
  13. C

    Tumble too powerful?

    Pun-Pun isn't munchkinism, it's theoretical optimization. No argument here. His bizarre statement that it magically meant systems mastery, however, was absurd. It's a good thing you didn't say it, then, because if you actually did say it then I'd be forced to laugh at both that and you...
  14. C

    The problem is choice

    Cool. I guess I'll take that as a compliment, given that player's apparently bottomless patience. Wow. A combination of obliviousness and paranoia even I could never hope to match. I'm sorry to break it to you, but you aren't the center of the world. I neither know you, nor would care to...
  15. C

    Would YOU take this flight on Friday the 13th?

    I'd have thought you'd just sell the ticket to pay for Hippy Girl's phone bills.
  16. C

    Tumble too powerful?

    So, what you're saying is that understanding all the rules and how the interact is munchkinism, but flagrantly disregarding the rules is proof, unquestionable absolute proof, of systems mastery? You want to rethink that?
  17. C

    Tumble too powerful?

    Yeah, pretty much this. I just got bored and annoyed when that guy started talking as if wizards prepared the exact same list every day and such, and decided to end it there.
  18. C

    Of the WotC Forums and the OTT

    I can tell. So who's the spine? Yep. I'd gotten bored with no one to really yell a-I mean argue wi- I mean, uh... have completely civil and reasonable discussions with... Uh, yeah, let's go with that. But, you, the spine? Uh, sorry bro, but your home life puts that option out of the table...
  19. C

    Of the WotC Forums and the OTT

    AHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! No, really, who's the spine? I'm obviously the brain, after all.
Top