Search results

Depends on the anime. I'd been trying to suppress my memories of Chlorox. Regardless, I'd go swordsage. It gives you a decent pseudo-flight and sword-beams, flash step can be replicated by Shadow Hand maneuvers, and Tiger Claw gives you a bajillion attacks. A dip in Whirling Frenzy barbarian...

A swordsage, a practitioner of supernatural martial arts, has a feel of the flow of magic. None. It's a very useful ability, and removing it will poke a few holes in many parties. I recommend keeping it.

Why? No, seriously, why? Why are wizards inherently antisocial? And, even more importantly, why are they distrusted? With Wieldskill, Eagle's Splendor, and not needing to bother with stats, so they can actually afford a decent Charisma, unlike the fighter, they can get much higher social skills...

Pretty much. Well, A 9th level spell, anyways.

A wizard knows every spell in their spellbook. And the domain spells from Domain Wizard.

No, I brought it out in response to the absurd idea that every single wizard always prepares the same set of spells. ... You're joking, right?

... Show me in the text of the scroll rules where it says a scroll is casting a spell, or that scrolls give you slots. Okay, I'll try again. Versatile Spellcaster makes you able to cast the next level of spell and raises your highest spell level. That gives you a Elven Wizard slot. Domain...

I'd have thought something this absurd would go without saying. Sorry you think that, but you're wrong. Yes, because that's what it is. See, the Wizard entry is kinda nice like that. >You can cast a higher level spell >You know the domain spells of that level. It's really clear. But, as I've...

You still should have plenty of slots. Assuming a Grey Elf, you should still get your Int bonus to slots. Plus, almost all of them are low level. Or, if you don't like that, you could Shapechange into a creature with racial spellcasting, since you explicitly get Natural abilities and untyped...

That's cool. I made an error and am glad you pointed that out to me. The spells I'd use are Adept Spirit(Magic of Incarnum, +1 Insight bonus to Caster Level), Suffer the Flesh(some con damage for a boost to CL, up to +5, Magic of Eberron), Spell Enhancer(SpC, +2 on a specific spell), and Mystic...

At this point? I'd like some text explicitly proving that any one critical part of this doesn't work. I've already proven it does with the pieces mentioned, so if anyone can provide explicit proof it doesn't work, I'll gladly admit I was wrong. I'd much rather be right than "win" an argument on...

Considering the types of posts others have been making, I doubt it would make a difference. Yes and no. You can't take the first half of a statement on the far side of a semicolon and treat it as if it were just on the other side. It doesn't work like that. Wrong. One cannot specialize and one...

That would be true were the thread not immediately here and completely recorded. Except it was because I'm not. Yes, I see exactly how easy it is for you to make baseless assertions. Except no. I have supported my argument with these mythical things known as "facts." I know they're obscure...

Already addressed. No points for effort, though, since you're repeating what's already disproved. Except it does.

Sure, and I'm totally in Vin Disiel's RPG group and he says you're wrong. ucwatididthar? I agree, you are. Trollololol?

So you've not paid attention at all. :rofl: Yeah, that wasn't even a nice try. I accept your concession. Personally? I don't have a problem with Versatile Spellcaster on list casters like Warmage. ...Uh, if a wizard really wants to prepare those spells, I don't see any problem at all with that...

First off, why does that matter? That has nothing to do with the mechanics. Second, seriously, if the only thing stopping you from pulling this abomination out is the DM saying "no," you've got problems. EDIT: Actually, you missed the semicolon. The two statements there are not directly...

Only if by "proof" you mean "flatly wrong statements intermixed with insults." No it isn't. The rules say what the rules say. So? A normal DM wouldn't allow a Nasty Gentleman in their game. That doesn't change the fact that it works. Because I'm right. [quotw]In the end it doesn't matter, your...

Taking hits doesn't work very well. Not getting hit is a much better option. Chargers are just fragile in that they're easy to shut down. Well, among other things, their pseudo-casting and amazing list. I mean, look at it. They've got a huge number of "no" buttons, some of the nicest buffs in...

Funny, the actual text disagrees with you. You make it sound like either one of those things matter in a discussion such as this. Making irrelevant statements is "proof" now? Cool. Coca-Cola is infinitely superior to Pepsi, so you're wrong. No, it's "That's what the rules say." You are...