Search results

The following was due to a misunderstanding of the statement Dave made originally, and does not reflect on him. It is only left as a statement of public record. Are you actually attempting to say, because of a legal NDA, the 1.1 they sent to be signed does not exist, was not the attempted...

Your statement: "Correct me if I am wrong, but those clauses are not in the OGL 1.2? The only public draft that was released." You mentioned a "public draft". That was 1.1. It was NOT a draft, it was sent to publishers, and expected to be signed. That is not a draft. Is anyone else starting...

1.1 was NOT a public draft, it was sent out with expected signatures by the 13th of this month. Please fact check that data.

This has been discussed to death. All the evidence was offered. It was not a Twitter-Storm, or moral outrage. This is people, watching the HIGH likelihood that their own livelihoods were about to be killed. Your food does not flow from the goodwill of a company shown to have acted in bad...

New one:

Oh. That's simple. So they can be seen. Rats like to hide in dark places, normally. I love knowing where the monsters are when they drag themselves into the light. Something about their egos just prevent any form of self preservation. I mean, evil people are going to evil. I'd rather see...

<Stares> I can't tell if you really don't get the point of what I was saying, or if your are messing with me. Reread, and worry less about the pronouns. Get back to me about the part where you normalized an AI making abstract connections between fictional entities and reporting back coherent...

Er... You do know there are housing crises right now? Right? Based on rent abuse? This is kinda going against your point.

... Did you just say... "Of course it"? My god you adapt quickly. This is not NORMAL. This is cyberpunk 2020 AI crap we dreamed up in the 80s and somebody mad scienced together. Get a GRIP MAN! YOU SHOULD BE PANICING! WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE! <cough> Sorry. Was having a moment. Carry on.

I love you. Marry me. Wait. Already married!

No clue. Seemed off to me to, with the D&D book of sex thing not getting shutdown. <shrugs> Not a lawyer though. The rest of the opinion on what Wizards said? I'm on board, really. Also think it's too late for the OGL 1.0a. Wizards is a proven liar in my book now, and I trust nothing they...

This is pretty much my total view on this in video format. Thanks DnD shorts.

This. This is what I've been saying. Except... Monetization is not just a subscription. Its microtransactions. Walled gardens. Making licensing contracts that prevent them from making content for 3rd party VTT. You're right. The are video game industry managers. And should be watched...

They just tried. Hence why everyone is turning into Robin Hood vs the Sherriff.

Well, are Red book, AD&D, AD&D2, and D&D 3rd. and 4th all compatible?

And in doing so told everyone who read it that the things they were feeling were important were in fact, not. You know, the same way some people walk up to gamers and tell them to grow up? Can you follow how that might trigger a tad of hostility?

Wait... Are people still believing that WotC were just testing the water with this, and not trying to blitzkrieg the contract through as fast as possible? They handed the contract over and said "sign by the 13th". Not, "we're getting your input on this, what do you think?" This was not cool...

Oh, let's run with it. Might be fun. Or horrific. Horrific fun!

I'm coming to the conclusion that some people want the problem to go away, have the game they like not get possibly fractured, and are willing to argue against the way WotC is being perceived based on it rocking the boat they want to keep riding in. And no, not shills, or sellouts. They just...

Seriously, stop that. Silence is not consent, nor agreement. It's waiting to see what's going on before jumping headlong into the fire. They has people They're responsible for, and they can take their doggon time.