Search results

I'd at the very least expand the allowed weapons to light, to allow for Sneak Attacks with clubs and handaxes and such. (Also to buff the Assassin specifically, I'd allow that subclass to Sneak Attack with any weapon, period, and give that subclass proficiency with all weapons, making for a...

Most campaigns through the history of D&D barely go past 10th level. And in 5e, many classes' levels 11-20 aren't exactly robust. So I voted no. I'd want classes (especially those that aren't full casters) to get nice things 11-20 before epic levels ever came into consideration.

If it was meant to make me empathize with the lead characters, it did a pretty bad job of that. I never empathized with Joel. He always came across as a sociopath to me, as well as kind of an idiot. And when he killed everybody in the hospital, it didn't make me think any different of him. I...

I haven't played it, but it seems to exist solely to "subvert expectations" for the sake of it. Which is something I've grown sick and tired of. So, I'm not interested in playing it at all. (It doesn't help that I also consider the first game a wildly overrated pastiche of video game tropes...

Ranger has to be the worst, hands-down. Both of its 1st-level features are worthless if the DM doesn't play nice.

Sure, they could, if piracy wasn't a concern. I'm not the biggest fan of anti-piracy measures myself, Steam included. But that doesn't mean it isn't a silly and childish attitude to disavow an entire hobby and an entire modern catalogue of games solely because of that. Well, to me, it comes...

It seems like a silly reason to miss out on so many great games over the last 17 years, but whatever. It's disappointing that I have to relitigate this topic 17 years into Steam's existence. A front-end program for a popular game distribution service is at all equal to obscure anti-virus...

And yet the Steam userbase has trended consistently upward. Looks like they're gaining a lot more customers than they supposedly lost.

ICYMI:

I mean, you've literally had 17 years to get used to the concept, but OK.

2 big things from today's stream so far: - The dialogue is in a more natural active style. I didn't necessarily hate the previous style, but I admit I do like this better. - Initiative system is now individual, as noted from last week's video, but with a twist that I like a lot. If you have...

Your loss.

Welcome to the last decade and a half of PC gaming. Enjoy your stay.

And every single one of them is 100x more effective than any 3.5 Paladin you could build, as the 3.5 Paladin is one of the most mechanically inept classes in the entire history of D&D.

Which for a game based on D&D would most certainly be individual initiative. Group initiative simply does not work in D&D.

2:41 in the video, it looks like group initiative has been done away with and it's now individual. You see a monster's turn queued up in between what look like the characters in the party. Obviously a very welcome change if that's true, as it was one of my actual concerns about BG3.

It was still better than the execrable trash that are the Bethesda Fallout games. (But yeah, current Obsidian is missing some of the talent that made New Vegas so great.)

Will one of them roll Wisdom (Insight) checks to not forget about the Iron Fleet?

Funny, the usual complaint is the exact opposite: Not enough content.

Those "low" attacks become a lot of attacks if there's several of them and they're all attacking you. Then your chances of using it increase again. Even at high levels, threats in the form of saves are typically once per encounter or recharge, so in rounds outside of those it is still useful.