Search results

Ah, the dangers of sharpening. Anyone else wanna chime in on 2d6? Here's your chance. :D

Witchfire Encounter 7d6+4 fire and -4 to attack rolls Yikes.

Beaten to it.

They may have gone with a mark replacement system as opposed to an "inviolate mark" for just this reason. Depending on the associated powers available, it may work out that the fighter marks the dragon and does his special follow up that is only allowed on marked enemies, then the paladin...

Pretending for the moment that WotC staff are humans who enjoy praise, I want to thank you guys for keeping an eye on our fraught ramblings. These little rejoinders are actually quite reassuring and helpful. <Huzzah> You may now return to your iron fisted tyranny.

I believe the original quote comes courtesy of a slight exaggeration of poster "Silent Wail" over on rpg.net.

No question there are other ways to implement. They opted for the "You guys handle the orcs, I'll try and keep the big guy busy" approach rather than the "you, stay here and I'll cover you" version. I'm okay with it. I agree. With the little we know, I'd prefer that the first to mark someone...

It answers the preexisting silly condition of being unable to defend your allies. I'll take that trade.

Looks like marking is or can be tied to powers. This suggests that it scales. It's also apparent that the fighter, at least, is capable of marking multiple opponents.

If my rogue can't get immunity to iocaine powder, then 4th edition fails! :p

Right. So no irresistible command. Pretty sweet. Although, it also means the paladin is likely going to experience one really painful round.

Nearly level appropriate power for comparison purposes. Hehe, no irresistible command.

Good point.

I voted for the tiefling cover. The dragon would have won out, nice dynamic scene going on, except that the dragon looks a little goofy and we can't have that.

Thankfully there ought to be some decent reflex attacks at that level.

3.5 Identify is a little more charitable, but you're right. It's obnoxious. Moreso if you don't have the right party complement to cast it at all.

It'd be great if it were simply a skill to detect magic, providing for the literary convention of the rogue or warrior being able to sense the presence of magic by virtue of having been around it for years(high level character with cross class skill).

Why does the appliance store sell doughnuts? :confused:

Miko

I think it's an error. If you get 10 skills it would make more sense if it said to pick from the list first and then 4 additional.