Search results

Actually, "we on the ENWorld 'D&D Rules' forum" tend to want to establish what the rules are. It's the main purpose of the forum. At least, that used to be the case and I'd like to think it still is. Most of us are even capable of understanding the difference between what the rules are and what...

Can you perhaps explain a little more how you "read" the extra damage from power attacking with a two-handed weapon to be equal to the number subtracted from your attack rolls? It seems to me that this "reading" flat out contradicts the Power Attack feat... Example: A fighter with a greataxe...

No, I did not. At no point do more than one multiplier apply to an abstract value. The values being multiplied are "the number subtracted from your attack rolls" (doubled as part of the regular Power Attack calculation) and "the extra damage from Power Attack" (tripled with the Leap Attack...

It's right as written, but I believe the intent of the errata was to make it 4x instead. (Just like the frenzied berserker's Supreme Power Attack ability - see the CW errata for an example.)

Power Attack with two-handed weapon: Extra damage equal to twice the number subtracted from your attack rolls. Leap Attack with two-handed weapon: Tripple "the extra damage from Power Attack". End result: 6x the number subtracted from your attack rolls.

You really think 6x is more balanced? :eek:

No, it hasn't. The tripple damage rule is the third sentence. The errata changes the second.

I'll let Dave Lister (slightly paraphrased) summarize my opinion of Jericho:

Which books can you use? And as Blightersbane suggested, some more info on the concept you had in mind (beyond "uses a quarterstaff") would be helpful.

Yes. Complete Mage feat excerpt: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/ex/20061010a&page=2

It's not a lot of damage, but a level four summon monster can get you a lantern archon with two 1d6 light ray touch attacks/round. The light ray is an extraordinary (=nonmagical) ability, and will go through the antimagic. (This works better if you have time to prepare and higher level spells...

If you're not going to wear armor you may as well put some monk levels in there. Convince the DM to let you have a feat that lets you treat a dwarven waraxe as a monk weapon. (The Eberron book has a few feats like that, for two-bladed sword, longsword and longspear. Call it a special order of...

Obligatory short time travel rant I'm starting to warm a little to Heroes. The acting and writing wasn't as clumsy as in the pervious episodes. Still not very impressive though. But the time travel... (Hiro and painter guy.) Why does almost every sci-fi show have to include this glaringly...

(Spell storing is a melee weapon special ability.)

No it doesn't. It's a separate ability, with separate turning attempts, much like the elemental turning powers.

Clerics are not proficient with martial weapons.

It's Disciple of the Sun, and it does nothing of the sort. Like I said, the feat works with turn undead and helps you destroy undead. It's quite specific. There's no real ambiguity here.

The third crusade, which Richard fought in, was initiated by Pope Gregory VIII. I'd say that justifies calling it "Pope Gregory's holy war".

No. The feat works with turn undead and lets you destroy undead. (Likewise you can't use turn lycanthropes or elemental turning to power divine feats that use turn undead. )

No. Bear warrior does not give you the wild shape ability.