Search results

The French series The Mysterious Cities of Gold. The whole series is essentially a campaign with recurring NPCs and villians.

Prediction: a slipcase with a setting book and adventure book for Spelljammer.

Since Rime of the Frostmaiden, they haven’t had a FR-oriented full length adventure. And if that’s what you want, you’re out of luck. And there hasn’t been any indication FR epic adventures are coming back. However, can I recommend a couple campaigns? Call of the Deep on DM’s Guild is really...

I’m not sure what you mean by reprints. I feel like all the adventures published for 5e are still available and many have had several printings. Do you mean new adventures based on existing FR lore or reimagined adventures from older editions?

D&D hasn’t really been medieval fantasy for years, if ever. If you want medieval fantasy, go with Pendragon. But I get your main point. Between the Witchlight carnival and Strixhaven U, more modern fantasy has seeped into D&D. But those are just two products. Ravenloft, Fizban’s and Candlekeep...

Complete Plays of William Shakespeare

Wildemount is pretty kitchen sink if you ask me, just new and attached to Critical Role. I’m not that into Critical Role, but I like Wildemount and I’m liking what I see of Netherdeep. Get over the whole Critical Role thing, and you’ve got a quality epic fantasy adventure in a fairly standard...

It’s not grimdark, at least not in my understanding of what makes something grimdark. Are there any officially published D&D adventures you would consider grimdark?

My latest theory is that it has to do with the “invisible mountain” from the adventure entitled Orchids of the Invisible Mountain.

With that line of thought, I’d argue most dungeons in D&D are highly impractical. At any rate, until we know the reasons behind the image (maybe the wall WAS on the ground and some magical force changed it), I’ll hold my judgement and appreciate the artistry.

Maybe not everyone can fly. I agree that as a wall, it’s highly impractical. If it’s a causeway or bridge to something, then it could make some limited sense.

Is it a wall or a causeway?

Earlier in the thread people were saying that WotC was choosing skin color over talent. Since they hadn’t seen the book, it’s a strange thing to say. Luckily, the moderators have squashed that line of comments.

Not every book is going to be to everyone’s liking. Does it need to be? Those saying that the current aesthetic is all light and fluffy haven’t been paying attention and they’re basing it on one adventure: Witchlight. Some people want more lighthearted fare like Witchlight (although the...

If only WotC catered to your needs rather than popular demand.

I love both those covers. I may have to buy this book twice. And an adventure anthology book will be great for my off-the-rails Strixhaven campaign. Do I want Spelljammer, Dragonlance and Planescape? Sure. Does this product sound amazing? Absolutely!

My prediction: we are about to get a box set of Spelljammer with a setting booklet and an adventure booklet. We are looking at the distorted image of the adventure cover.

I'm honestly not a fan of Critical Role, but I find the settings books (Wildemount and the Tal'Dorei Reborn books) to be outstanding. I'm looking forward to seeing this adventure.

I think they wanted to avoid the idea of race being tied to behaviors, so they went with supernatural abilities. A specific kender culture might, however, still be open to "borrowing" other people's things. As a long-time Dragonlance fan, I'm cool with it. I'm sure there will be plenty who are...

You disagree with people making the game what they want it to be? Some people will continue to make certain races a certain alignment and others won't. Nobody is wrong. It's a preference. WotC is acknowledging that.