Search results

Thanks! I don't really do PDFs (except as back-ups to print stuff) and PoD often feels overpriced - but I will definitely check 'em out.

I'd give every registered user on ENworld (approximately) $8500 (unless they are on my ignore list).

Based on this post, I am gonna keep an eye out for a cheap secondhand copy of the 4E MM.

I knew someone was gonna make that joke as soon as I hit submit, and cringed, but at least it was @Snarf Zagyg, so it was halfway decent (but only halfway). ;)

It depends on the specific scenario. It depends on the game. It depends on the table culture. It depends on the GM. It depends on individual players. It depends on your mood. It depends. . . It depends. . . It depends. . . It depends. . .

Looking back over this thread, I laughed when I got to this, because by the time I got around to actually including it, I changed it back to fey.

Bias? ;):LOL: I gave away my 4E books in 2009 and correctly or not, I think of the rules as so far out there that I never think to check its versions of monsters. I feel like I have plenty of sources to use without 4E, but now that you've mentioned it, I will take a peek when relevant, if I...

Sorry for the delay in response. As I suggested above, when linking to this thread, since I mostly convert older edition adventures to 5E I am frequently looking up the monsters included there in the 5E MM, being kinda disappointed in the adaptation and then doing my own by looking back at...

I don’t think I understand your question or what my post has to do with agency.

Ultimately, “that is how we play/ed it and it works/ed for us” is the best answer seems like the best answer I can expect about a lot of topics on these boards.

My feeling is, if you don’t want the possibility of that kind of story (where the fiction of the pact matters) don’t play a warlock. At least, that is what I’d say to anyone wanting to play one in a campaign I was running.

I will have to say however that both my groups tend to short rest as much as possible, so having fewer HD to work with matters to the table style.

They’d get to choose which they spend. I see no issue with that. They are still giving that up for other potential magical uses (many magical items in my games grant additional powers via spending HD*) or regaining HPs. I personally enforce a lower HD replenish before bigger HD do house rule...

😂. I just got sucked into reading that old thread and it eventually takes up the very debate in this thread. Nothing ever changes on ENWorld.

D&D 5E (2014) - "If They Have a Name They Get Death Saves. . ." 😂

I don't know what to say. It works fine for me. I am basing it on what a 6th level wizard would have. I might note something like Yalp Waps Evkr6/LN, so I know what kind of spells to give him and if he had any special powers worth noting. (For example, if I made an NPC diviner I’d give him the...

Honestly when I have done similar effects, I have the player/creature roll the hit die sacrificed and that is the bonus or penalty (or the result to look at on a chart).

I am in agreement. There are plenty of 3PP products if you don’t feel like making it up your self and plenty of room to make it up yourself if you are so inclined. No RPG can actually deliver every aspect that every player might want as part of the core rules and it seems silly to think...

The vast majority of NPCs don’t even need stats. For a good number I will just note something like Wiz6/LN. And that is all the info i need. Enough to improvise an encounter if it suddenly comes to combat and enough to have a general sense of their capabilities if it doesn’t. 🤷🏽‍♂️

I’m away from home. But if I get a chance tonight I’ll check my PDF folder