Search results

Bonus action or not is still irrelevant there. The benefit in Nick is in keeping that bonus action available. That depends on the assumptions being made in the accuracy to hit in the first place. Easier targets and it's a whatever moment, harder targets the more attacks the better. But it's...

Valor bards are fine too. It's not like they can't use CHA and subbing in Truestrike for 1 attack can work. True. But that's only really a concern when the build doesn't invest in both anyway. The CHA/DEX valor bard, for example, gets strong benefits with either stat focus first. Magical...

Most rogues aren't 20th level for that damage and your assessment is missing my point that the advantage in Nick is leaving the bonus action available for other options. But if we're talking higher levels Monks have an easy 6 attacks with Nick and Flurry in tiers three and four starting at 10th...

Don't need both. Darkness in the Shadow monk is for advantage. Topple in the Open Hand monk is for advantage. But you also only get a limited number of Weapon Masteries with feat or splashing so we need to look at those overlaps. ;-) I would also point out that all characters still have...

There were a lot of responses, so please bear with me. To be fair, that is the part of your OP that makes it look like you are cheesing the warlock dip. There was no mention of Truestrike in the OP. There is no difference in pumping INT instead of DEX as far as other ability scores are...

Using the reaction to buff an ally instead of saving the reaction to harm an opponent seems equitable enough to me.

These conditions can be met in other ways. Prone is already an option in the Open Hand monk and advantage is available through Darkness in the Shadow monk. These other Weapon Mastery options can be available through the feat for other monks who don't want to multi-class and gives that feat...

If the attack is using a spell attack modifier and the PC is building DEX instead then the attack does less damage and also hits less often. Starting with a 14 DEX is still only 1 point in AC behind. The rogue in armor has a 14 AC instead of a 15 AC. But by using the Sage background for the...

The feat for also adds to DEX and doesn't create later access to all those monk goodies in the class progression, or cost the capstone. The feat itself is mostly trash but given the monk is one of the few classes that might make effective use of Nick but doesn't have access to it in the class...

An extra d6 doesn't make up for the damage lost to accuracy, and you just told me that rogues will struggle due to lower AC but now you're telling me they sacrifice some AC for this build anyway? The difference in AC is 2 or 3 points with the Sage option. That's easily manageable with the...

When that feat grants an extra attack and boosts a desirable ability score it doesn't seem so expensive to me. Why do you think so many people were taking PAM for the bonus action attack in their damage calcs? ;-)

It's a versatile option to select 1 cantrip from the wizard list daily. Being used as a cantrip that misses more than dual wielding with a Nick weapon off hand and using DEX for attack damage rolls isn't more versatile than taking a background that uses a different ability score such as WIS for...

Getting Truestrike from a High Elf for a rogue is how this discussion got started. I am aware. But gaining Truestrike from a High Elf doesn't change the ability score it uses either, which is where picking it up from the Sage background is an advantage in boosting that casting stat and the...

I question why the build claims splashing a bard, sorcerer, or warlock and the complaint is specific to Eldritch Blast. I would think that if the build dumps CHA and then maxes INT instead of dumping INT and maxing CHA then splashing 1-4 levels of wizard would still supply that bit extra spell...

I do like the idea of a rogue better than a fighter. Nick + Expertise is appealing, and a bit more damage from SA certainly doesn't hurt, but then again SA I think becomes less than the TWF Fighting Style a fighter offers. Seems like more of a "2 second winds vs expertise" choice to me. If...

This is also "as written": Players still have the option for backgrounds from older books or custom backgrounds. Either gives an origin feat of choice. It takes a rather ornery DM to nitpick the background to deny those options, IMO, but I suppose "DM is ornery" is a possibility. ;-) With...

It's also the extra flurry attack at 10th level, but it's not just the number of attacks. It's Extra Attack, Stunning Attack, Evasion, feats, other abilities from Heightened Focus, Self Restoration, Deflect Energy, Disciplined Survivor, Perfect Focus, every subclass feature, and anything else...

That can also be done by origin feat by any race using a background. Easier with a human. Or spend a feat from the class progression but that seems suboptimal given how easy it is to get the origin feat.

Right, the build gets those extra attacks earlier but loses everything else later. Once the straight class has hit level 5 it's caught up on the initial extra attacks and is ahead by the extra attack feature. The multiclass catches that up a level later but by then any advantage to have gotten...

So would other classes. The issue I would have with that is every other class feature gets delayed a level including feats and the loss of a good capstone if the campaign does play that far.