Search results

Fair! It is fully supported for 3.5 as well though, moreso than 4e. Definitely still 3.5e and PF players out there (my group never moved on from 3.5).

Totally. I've often wondered why there was never a setting with similar vibes but not in a desert. Scarred Lands for 3e is the closest I can think of. Were you a fan of that? And/or Eberron?

As good an answer as any!

People keep talking about Arcane and while I am interested in watching it I am actually afraid it will ruin Eberron for me as people, including Keith Baker, keep saying that it's the closest example of what Sharn is like in his head that we'll get from TV. Sharn in my head looks like a Yoshitaka...

I'm on a setting kick and there seems to be serious talk of Dark Sun being revived for 5e. Whenever Dark Sun comes up it gets a lot of praise. It's one of those settings where even people who have never run or played it so that they wish they had or could. The setting also of course falls...

I feel that this 2010 quote from Rob Kuntz is relevant here. He posits that medieval fantasy was only a weighed commerical decision that was only meant to be limited to D&Ds introduction, and that he and Gary felt that the game was capable of much more, and that they experimented with many...

Do you still use it as a setting?

Fair enough. Although, my group plays 3.5 and I really like that I can use my Monster Manual(s) to their full potential in this world. Dark Sun is another world I enjoy, but a campaign there would limit me to just a handful of monster maual entries and I would otherwise need to use the Athasian...

It's interesting how many fans Planescape and Eberron share. I suppose it makes sense though.

Quite obscure, although I actually know of Pelinore! Have not heard of Irilian.

Xen'Drik is one of the areas that interested me from the beginning and the one that kept me looking at the setting off and on over the years. What aspects of it had you balking at it in the beginning? Similar to my experience? What other settings do you like?

Is that the Rising from the Last War book? And what settings do you dig otherwise?

When you compare it to Greyhawk now, what do you think? And could you see yourself running Greyhawk again?

Sounds awesome.

I have been looking at the 3.5 books (I even bought a handful between 2004 and 2006) and comparing them to the newer stuff I have seen. Not quite the same, especially the art. What is the new book they are coming out with?

Golarion seems great as well! How do you feel about it in regards to Eberron? Would you run Golarion even without PF rules?

I actually played that in 2008 and quickly dropped it. However, I've loaded it up again since re-discovering and interest in Eberron. Turns out I still have that old account as well. What were you into setting-wise before Eberron?

I remember conversations like this around the time it came out and for years after. I'm one of those people whose first interaction with Dungeons & Dragons was the Dragonlance novels in the late 90s (sub in the 1980s or Forgotten Realms or Greyhawk etc. depending on the person). This was not...

Perhaps @robertsconley or someone else who worked on the book: In player's guide to the wilderlands, the class description says they gain: I am guessing Ω = 1/2? Unsure though...

This wasn't specified in the 3.0 description though, which is what this thread was about (started before 3.5 released). This was clarified in the 3.5 text.