Search results

Yeah, my notes run long too.

You asked for it... The maps are in Coreldraw X3, and I'm not uploading them.

GAZ 1: The Grand Duchy of Karameikos, for B/X. Honorable mentions to GAZ 5: The Elves of Alfheim and GAZ 6: The Dwarves of Rockhome. Also an honorable mention to Aurora's Whole Realms Catalogue for 2e.

Not a selfie, but I do have an obligatory internet cat photo:

I'm satisfied with how I handle gems as a GM, harking back to this recent thread. But I've been wrestling with handling jewelry and artworks and finding that a tougher problem. Issue the first is that the size varies much much more for jewelry than for gems: Gems are about the weight of a...

Want! EDIT: Ordered!

I'm running 3.5e, and I let rangers take a feat instead of an animal companion. In fact, in my Brotherhood of Rangers game (where all the PCs are ranger-gestalts with other classes) I required that no character have more than one companion total from their class features (animal...

The "Benevolent GM Stance" sounds like the equivalent to the sort of read-only fiction "where the author is on the protagonist's side."

I'm not a fan of low ability scores for PCs in general. My view is that PCs are inherently Superior, and their ability scores ought to reflect this. I am a fan of point-buy systems in other games, but I took a dislike to the D&D 3.x version from the moment I first saw it. But I also didn't...

I do homebrew settings, and creating cosmologies is an essential part of that. Not so much for my players (or my readers, in the case of settings for my read-only fiction) but for my own use. So I voted "Yes, but more as something to dive into as secondary media/pleasure reading."

I was never a big fan of psi powers in D&D. The only way I'd be happy with psi powers in a game I ran or played in would be if they were deliberately nerfed, deliberately made significantly weaker than 'regular' magic of either the divine or arcane variety. Also, I'd consider it critical that...

I want rules that deal with the issue of character ability being different from player ability. This sometimes produces conflicts between the character being able to Do Stuff, and the character being under the Direction and Control of the player. But leaving e.g. the social skills of the...

I go for small, lair-like dungeons that are part of the surface ecosystem, rather than dungeons that are deep and isolated enough to form their own ecosystems. But if I did do a mega-dungeon, it would probably feature: Perpetual motion photosynthesis, with glowing moss producing its own light...

True. I've seen both sorts of advancement in the same game, especially in the Old Days. A pattern I often saw was rapid leveling up (often 1 level per session) until the characters reached the Levels That Didn't Suck, followed by much slower advancement and a focus on other things. "Now that...

Or tone down the rapid advancement.

I have a TableSmith table that produces gem results that look like the following: A large yellow faceted stone (citrine) of superior quality worth 250 gp A medium yellow cat’s-eye, of superior quality worth 150 gp A packet of 10 diminutive gems, each a clear faceted stone (rock crystal) of...

Rich by the standard of most people in the settings you prefer. Those settings are not the only possible ones. People living at the poverty line in the US are rich as hell by the standards of third- and fourth-world nations, or by 19th century standards. That doesn't make them rich in an...

No, it's a house-rule thing. 3e RAW implicitly assumes much lower incomes for NPCs.

Sure, a PC can always choose to spend only enough to live a modest or even an ascetic life. What they can't do is live that modest life while simultaneously claiming "I am living the life of a well-off member of the gentry; I am living the life of someone who is rich." At best, they can live a...